Response surface methodology as an efficient tool for optimizing carbon adsorbents for CO2 capture

Abstract Phenol–formaldehyde resins and a low-cost biomass residue, olive stones (OS), were used to prepare five activated carbons for CO 2 separation at atmospheric pressure, i.e., in post-combustion processes or from biogas and bio-hydrogen streams. Two phenol–formaldehyde resins were synthesized: Resol , obtained by using alkaline environment, and Novolac , synthesized in the presence of an acid catalyst. Carbon precursors were prepared by mixing both resins with KCl or by mixing the Novolac resin with OS. The precursors were carbonized under an inert atmosphere of N 2 at different temperatures. The last stage in the synthesis of the adsorbents involved physical activation with carbon dioxide, which was carried out at different temperatures and burn-off degrees. Response surface methodology (RSM) is proposed as a tool for rapidly optimizing the activation parameters in order to obtain the highest possible CO 2 capture capacity of activated carbons. The optimum values of activation temperature and burn-off degree that maximize CO 2 uptake by the activated carbons at 35 °C and atmospheric pressure were obtained within the experimental region. A value of CO 2 adsorption capacity of 9.3 wt.% was achieved. Activated carbons derived from the Novolac phenol–formaldehyde resin type and from OS showed great potential as adsorbents for CO 2 capture at atmospheric pressure.

[1]  J. J. Pis,et al.  Surface modification of activated carbons for CO2 capture , 2008 .

[2]  J. J. Pis,et al.  Microporous phenol-formaldehyde resin-based adsorbents for pre-combustion CO2 capture , 2011 .

[3]  Covadonga Pevida,et al.  CO2 capture by adsorption with nitrogen enriched carbons , 2007 .

[4]  Borja Arias,et al.  Different Approaches for the Development of Low-Cost CO2 Adsorbents , 2009 .

[5]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[6]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Layered Vacuum Pressure-Swing Adsorption for Biogas Upgrading , 2007 .

[7]  Youssef Belmabkhout,et al.  Influence of regeneration conditions on the cyclic performance of amine-grafted mesoporous silica for CO2 capture: An experimental and statistical study , 2010 .

[8]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. , 2009, ChemSusChem.

[9]  M. V. Gil,et al.  Breakthrough adsorption study of a commercial activated carbon for pre-combustion CO2 capture , 2011 .

[10]  F. Rubiera,et al.  Application of thermogravimetric analysis to the evaluation of aminated solid sorbents for CO2 capture , 2008 .

[11]  S. Tennison Phenolic-resin-derived activated carbons , 1998 .

[12]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[13]  S. Tennison,et al.  The use of carbons produced from phenolic resins for flue gas desulphurization , 1993 .

[14]  Borja Arias,et al.  Development of low-cost biomass-based adsorbents for postcombustion CO2 capture , 2009 .

[15]  Deniz Baş,et al.  Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology , 2007 .

[16]  F. Tezel,et al.  Optimisation of carbon dioxide recovery from flue gas in a TPSA system , 2010 .

[17]  M. Bezerra,et al.  Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. , 2008, Talanta.