Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.

Adequate reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is necessary to allow accurate critical appraisal of the validity and applicability of the results. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, a 22-item checklist and flow diagram, is intended to address this problem by improving the reporting of RCTs. However, some specific issues that apply to trials of nonpharmacologic treatments (for example, surgery, technical interventions, devices, rehabilitation, psychotherapy, and behavioral intervention) are not specifically addressed in the CONSORT Statement. Furthermore, considerable evidence suggests that the reporting of nonpharmacologic trials still needs improvement. Therefore, the CONSORT group developed an extension of the CONSORT Statement for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. A consensus meeting of 33 experts was organized in Paris, France, in February 2006, to develop an extension of the CONSORT Statement for trials of nonpharmacologic treatments. The participants extended 11 items from the CONSORT Statement, added 1 item, and developed a modified flow diagram. To allow adequate understanding and implementation of the CONSORT extension, the CONSORT group developed this elaboration and explanation document from a review of the literature to provide examples of adequate reporting. This extension, in conjunction with the main CONSORT Statement and other CONSORT extensions, should help to improve the reporting of RCTs performed in this field.

[1]  R. Sataloff.  Quality of Reporting in Randomized Trials , 2010, Ear, nose, & throat journal.

[2]  David Moher,et al.  Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[4]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. , 2007, Gaceta sanitaria.

[5]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[6]  B. Giraudeau,et al.  Sample size calculation for multicenter randomized trial: taking the center effect into account. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[7]  K. Refshauge,et al.  Physiotherapist-Directed Exercise, Advice, or Both for Subacute Low Back Pain , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Brett Hanscom,et al.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Jian Wei Wang,et al.  Conventional Versus Binding Pancreaticojejunostomy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[10]  P. Schnurr,et al.  Cognitive behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in women: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[11]  David Moher,et al.  Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Rafael Perera,et al.  Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  J. Skinner,et al.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[14]  D. Moher,et al.  The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement: A Systematic Review , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  M. Clarke,et al.  Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[17]  L. Gluud.  Bias in clinical intervention research. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  David Moher,et al.  Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  M. Tansella,et al.  Seven criteria for improving effectiveness trials in psychiatry , 2006, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[21]  Linda C. Li,et al.  Effectiveness of the primary therapist model for rheumatoid arthritis rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  Consort Grou.  Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement , 2006 .

[23]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. , 2006, JAMA.

[24]  P. Schnurr,et al.  Issues in the design of multisite clinical trials of psychotherapy: VA Cooperative Study No. 494 as an example. , 2005, Contemporary clinical trials.

[25]  E. Halm,et al.  Primary closure of the carotid artery is associated with poorer outcomes during carotid endarterectomy. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  D. Wennberg,et al.  The relation between patients' outcomes and the volume of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation procedures performed by physicians treating Medicare beneficiaries. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  Alizan A. Khalil,et al.  Evolution of methodological standards in surgical trials , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[28]  Robert D Herbert,et al.  Analysis of quality of interventions in systematic reviews , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  E. Halm,et al.  Clinical and operative predictors of outcomes of carotid endarterectomy. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[30]  Deborah J. Cook,et al.  Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: An audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score* , 2005, Critical care medicine.

[31]  A. Gawande,et al.  Proficiency of Surgeons in Inguinal Hernia Repair: Effect of Experience and Age , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[32]  P. Ravaud,et al.  A priori postulated and real power in cluster randomized trials: mind the gap , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[33]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported? , 2005, Clinical trials.

[34]  P. Dieppe,et al.  Characteristic and incidental (placebo) effects in complex interventions such as acupuncture , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Klaus Linde,et al.  Acupuncture for patients with migraine: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[36]  Chris Roberts,et al.  Design and analysis of clinical trials with clustering effects due to treatment , 2005, Clinical trials.

[37]  Simon G Thompson,et al.  The use of random effects models to allow for clustering in individually randomized trials , 2005, Clinical trials.

[38]  W. Kirwan,et al.  Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[39]  E. Lim.  Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  James G Wright,et al.  Treatments for paediatric femoral fractures: a randomised trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[41]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals , 2005, The Lancet.

[42]  S. Thompson,et al.  Clustering by health professional in individually randomised trials , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  P. Rothwell,et al.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” , 2005, The Lancet.

[44]  N Engl,et al.  A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee , 2005 .

[45]  E. Ventureyra,et al.  Radioisotope shuntograms at the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario , 2005, Child's Nervous System.

[46]  E. Ernst,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of magnetic bracelets for relieving pain in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[47]  Amanda Farrin,et al.  Randomised trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: outcomes and patients' preference , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[48]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[50]  D. Urbach,et al.  Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data. , 2004, Quality & safety in health care.

[51]  H. Pokorny,et al.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia , 2004, European Surgery.

[52]  K. Yarasheski,et al.  Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[53]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[54]  D. Moher,et al.  Turning a blind eye:Testing the success of blinding and the CONSORT statement , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  Michael J Campbell,et al.  Extending CONSORT to include cluster trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[56]  D. Altman,et al.  CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[57]  T. Treasure,et al.  Surgical research revisited: clinical trials in the cardiothoracic surgical literature. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[58]  Robert E Harbaugh,et al.  Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States. , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[59]  John A. Cowan,et al.  Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[60]  R. Lilford,et al.  Trials in surgery , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[61]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it? , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[62]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Methodological differences in clinical trials evaluating nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments of hip and knee osteoarthritis. , 2003, JAMA.

[63]  K. Dickersin,et al.  Surgical quality assurance in the Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Decompression Trial (IONDT). , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[64]  C. Begg,et al.  Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection , 2003, Journal of surgical oncology.

[65]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[66]  A. Berg,et al.  U.S. Preventive services task force. Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote physical activity: recommendation and rationale. , 2003, The American journal of nursing.

[67]  G. Parry,et al.  Volume of procedures and outcome of treatment , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[68]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[69]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[70]  S. Woolf,et al.  Counseling to promote a healthy diet in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. , 2003, American journal of preventive medicine.

[71]  D. Rennie,et al.  The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[72]  G. Hankey,et al.  Routine or Selective Carotid Artery Shunting for Carotid Endarterectomy (and Different Methods of Monitoring in Selective Shunting) , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[73]  John A. Cowan,et al.  Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[74]  Peter Sandercock,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[75]  A. Molyneux.  International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[76]  Ethan A Halm,et al.  Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[77]  U. P. S. T. Force.  Behavioral Counseling in Primary Care To Promote Physical Activity: Recommendation and Rationale , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[78]  H. Johansson,et al.  The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[79]  Mitsuru Sasako,et al.  Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[80]  A. Hrõbjartsson.  What are the main methodological problems in the estimation of placebo effects? , 2002, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[81]  Marc F. Swiontkowski,et al.  An Observational Study of Orthopaedic Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Text Publications , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[82]  M. Bhandari,et al.  The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000 , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[83]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the Fracture Care Literature , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[84]  Alex H S Harris,et al.  The Accuracy of Abstracts in Psychology Journals , 2002, The Journal of psychology.

[85]  I. Chalmers,et al.  The Landscape and Lexicon of Blinding in Randomized Trials , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[86]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Quality of Intervention Research Reporting in Medical Rehabilitation Journals , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[87]  福永 幹彦.  Hrobjartsson A, Gotzsche PC : Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment , 2002 .

[88]  K. Brandt,et al.  Tidal irrigation as treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a sham-controlled, randomized, double-blinded evaluation. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[89]  Christian Gluud,et al.  Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[90]  C. Olanow,et al.  Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson's disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[91]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[92]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[93]  D. Moher,et al.  The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[94]  P. Schnurr,et al.  Design of Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study no. 420: group treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[95]  T. Ryan,et al.  Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. , 2000, JAMA.

[96]  P. Maddock,et al.  Impact of breast cancer treatment guidelines on surgeon practice patterns: results of a hospital-based intervention. , 2000, Surgery.

[97]  R. Pitkin,et al.  Effectiveness of a journal intervention to improve abstract quality. , 2000, JAMA.

[98]  K. Dobson,et al.  Therapist competence ratings in relation to clinical outcome in cognitive therapy of depression. , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[99]  D. Sell,et al.  Influence of surgeon's experience on speech outcome in cleft lip and palate , 1999, The Lancet.

[100]  C. Roberts,et al.  The implications of variation in outcome between health professionals for the design and analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[101]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Randomized clinical trials in medical rehabilitation research. , 1999, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[102]  R. Bell,et al.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[103]  M. Choti,et al.  Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[104]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Accuracy of data in abstracts of published research articles. , 1999, JAMA.

[105]  E. Hannan,et al.  Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. , 1998, Stroke.

[106]  D. Cook,et al.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.

[107]  B. Crawley,et al.  Reporting of randomized clinical trial descriptors and use of structured abstracts. , 1998, JAMA.

[108]  R M Pitkin,et al.  Can the accuracy of abstracts be improved by providing specific instructions? A randomized controlled trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[109]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[110]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Relationship between the Volume of Total Hip Replacements Performed by Providers and the Rates of Postoperative Complications in the State of Washington* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[111]  T. Limbird,et al.  Operative Treatment of Fractures of the Tibial Plafond. A Randomized, Prospective Study* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[112]  C. Stoddard,et al.  Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy , 1996, The Lancet.

[113]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology , 1996, BMJ.

[114]  W S Moore,et al.  Surgical results: a justification of the surgeon selection process for the ACAS trial. The ACAS Investigators. , 1996, Journal of vascular surgery.

[115]  C. Lavernia,et al.  Relationship of surgical volume to short-term mortality, morbidity, and hospital charges in arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[116]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[117]  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. , 1995, JAMA.

[118]  J. Mintz,et al.  Implications of therapist effects for the design and analysis of comparative studies of psychotherapies. , 1991, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[119]  MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL , 1931, British medical journal.