Effect of flow on endothelial endocytosis of nanocarriers targeted to ICAM-1.

Delivery of drugs into the endothelium by nanocarriers targeted to endothelial determinants may improve treatment of vascular maladies. This is the case for intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), a glycoprotein overexpressed on endothelial cells (ECs) in many pathologies. ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers bind to and are internalized by ECs via a non-classical pathway, CAM-mediated endocytosis. In this work we studied the effects of endothelial adaptation to physiological flow on the endocytosis of model polymer nanocarriers targeted to ICAM-1 (anti-ICAM/NCs, ~180 nm diameter). Culturing established endothelial-like cells (EAhy926 cells) and primary human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) under 4 dyn/cm(2) laminar shear stress for 24 h resulted in flow adaptation: cell elongation and formation of actin stress fibers aligned to the flow direction. Fluorescence microscopy showed that flow-adapted cells internalized anti-ICAM/NCs under flow, although at slower rate versus non flow-adapted cells under static incubation (~35% reduction). Uptake was inhibited by amiloride, whereas marginally affected by filipin and cadaverine, implicating that CAM-endocytosis accounts for anti-ICAM/NC uptake under flow. Internalization under flow was more modestly affected by inhibiting protein kinase C, which regulates actin remodeling during CAM-endocytosis. Actin recruitment to stress fibers that maintain the cell shape under flow may delay uptake of anti-ICAM/NCs under this condition by interfering with actin reorganization needed for CAM-endocytosis. Electron microscopy revealed somewhat slow, yet effective endocytosis of anti-ICAM/NCs by pulmonary endothelium after i.v. injection in mice, similar to that of flow-adapted cell cultures: ~40% (30 min) and 80% (3 h) internalization. Similar to cell culture data, uptake was slightly faster in capillaries with lower shear stress. Further, LPS treatment accelerated internalization of anti-ICAM/NCs in mice. Therefore, regulation of endocytosis of ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers by flow and endothelial status may modulate drug delivery into ECs exposed to different physiological (capillaries vs. arterioles/venules) or pathological (ischemia, inflammation) levels and patterns of blood flow.

[1]  D. Barber,et al.  Direct binding of the Na--H exchanger NHE1 to ERM proteins regulates the cortical cytoskeleton and cell shape independently of H(+) translocation. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[2]  A M Malek,et al.  Mechanism of endothelial cell shape change and cytoskeletal remodeling in response to fluid shear stress. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[3]  Silvia Muro,et al.  In Vivo Imaging of 64Cu-Labeled Polymer Nanoparticles Targeted to the Lung Endothelium , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Jodie L. Conyers,et al.  Antibody-labeled liposomes for CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaques: in vitro investigation of an anti-ICAM antibody-labeled liposome containing iohexol for molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques via computed tomography. , 2009, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[5]  D. Staunton,et al.  Association of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) with actin- containing cytoskeleton and alpha-actinin , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Control of endothelial targeting and intracellular delivery of therapeutic enzymes by modulating the size and shape of ICAM-1-targeted carriers. , 2008, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[7]  D. Granger,et al.  Role of CD11/CD18 in shear rate-dependent leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in cat mesenteric venules. , 1991, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  Control of intracellular trafficking of ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers by endothelial Na+/H+ exchanger proteins. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology.

[9]  S. Schmid,et al.  The emergence of clathrin-independent pinocytic pathways. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[10]  D. Hammer,et al.  Lu‐ECAM‐1‐mediated adhesion of melanoma cells to endothelium under conditions of flow , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[11]  Elisabetta Dejana,et al.  Endothelial cell–cell junctions: happy together , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  Jin Liu,et al.  Computational model for nanocarrier binding to endothelium validated using in vivo, in vitro, and atomic force microscopy experiments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  P. M. Hinkle,et al.  Activation of MAPK by TRH Requires Clathrin-Dependent Endocytosis and PKC but Not Receptor Interaction with β-Arrestin or Receptor Endocytosis , 2001 .

[14]  D. Crommelin,et al.  Adhesion molecules: a new target for immunoliposome‐mediated drug delivery , 1995, FEBS letters.

[15]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Purified intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is a ligand for lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 (LFA-1) , 1987, Cell.

[16]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  A novel endocytic pathway induced by clustering endothelial ICAM-1 or PECAM-1 , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[17]  D. Crommelin,et al.  Cellular uptake of liposomes targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) on bronchial epithelial cells. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  Na Zhang,et al.  PLGA nanoparticle--peptide conjugate effectively targets intercellular cell-adhesion molecule-1. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[19]  L. Sauvage,et al.  Effect of shear stress upon localization of the Golgi apparatus and microtubule organizing center in isolated cultured endothelial cells. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[20]  Feng Gao,et al.  Oxygen microscopy by two-photon-excited phosphorescence. , 2008, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[21]  A. Sabnis,et al.  Shear-regulated uptake of nanoparticles by endothelial cells and development of endothelial-targeting nanoparticles. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[22]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  ICAM-directed vascular immunotargeting of antithrombotic agents to the endothelial luminal surface. , 2003, Blood.

[23]  A. Malik,et al.  Regulation of endothelial permeability via paracellular and transcellular transport pathways. , 2010, Annual review of physiology.

[24]  Silvia Muro,et al.  Flow dynamics, binding and detachment of spherical carriers targeted to ICAM-1 on endothelial cells. , 2009, Biorheology.

[25]  A. Gotlieb,et al.  Patterns of Endothelial Microfilament Distribution in the Rabbit Aorta In Situ , 1989, Circulation research.

[26]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  Optimizing endothelial targeting by modulating the antibody density and particle concentration of anti-ICAM coated carriers. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[27]  S. Botchway,et al.  The use of time-resolved fluorescence imaging in the study of protein kinase C localisation in cells , 2005, BMC Cell Biology.

[28]  Aliasger K Salem,et al.  Leukocyte-inspired biodegradable particles that selectively and avidly adhere to inflamed endothelium in vitro and in vivo , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  Endothelial endocytic pathways: gates for vascular drug delivery. , 2004, Current vascular pharmacology.

[30]  Silvia Muro,et al.  Delivery of Acid Sphingomyelinase in Normal and Niemann-Pick Disease Mice Using Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1-Targeted Polymer Nanocarriers , 2008, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[31]  Silvia Muro,et al.  Enhanced endothelial delivery and biochemical effects of α-galactosidase by ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers for Fabry disease. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[32]  D. Hammer,et al.  Artificial polymeric cells for targeted drug delivery. , 2003, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[33]  C. Edgell,et al.  Permanent cell line expressing human factor VIII-related antigen established by hybridization. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  RhoA activation and actin reorganization involved in endothelial CAM-mediated endocytosis of anti-PECAM carriers: critical role for tyrosine 686 in the cytoplasmic tail of PECAM-1. , 2008, Blood.

[35]  L. Glimcher,et al.  Differing regulation and function of ICAM-1 and class II antigens on renal tubular cells. , 1990, Kidney international.

[36]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.

[37]  I. Gurubhagavatula,et al.  Antibodies Against the First Ig-Like Domain of Human Platelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (PECAM-1) That Inhibit PECAM-1-Dependent Homophilic Adhesion Block In Vivo Neutrophil Recruitment1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[38]  V. Muzykantov,et al.  ICAM-1 recycling in endothelial cells: a novel pathway for sustained intracellular delivery and prolonged effects of drugs. , 2005, Blood.

[39]  María Yáñez-Mó,et al.  Dynamic interaction of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 with moesin and ezrin in a novel endothelial docking structure for adherent leukocytes , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.