Accuracy of a New Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Algorithm

Background: Through minimally invasive sensor-based continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), individuals can manage their blood glucose (BG) levels more aggressively, thereby improving their hemoglobin A1c level, while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. Tighter glycemic control through CGM, however, requires an accurate glucose sensor and calibration algorithm with increased performance at lower BG levels. Methods: Sensor and BG measurements for 72 adult and adolescent subjects were obtained during the course of a 26-week multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of the Paradigm® REAL-Time (PRT) sensor-augmented pump system (Medtronic Diabetes, Northridge, CA) in an outpatient setting. Subjects in the study arm performed at least four daily finger stick measurements. A retrospective analysis of the data set was performed to evaluate a new calibration algorithm utilized in the Paradigm® Veo™ insulin pump (Medtronic Diabetes) and to compare these results to performance metrics calculated for the PRT. Results: A total of N = 7193 PRT sensor downloads for 3 days of use, as well as 90,472 temporally and nonuniformly paired data points (sensor and meter values), were evaluated, with 5841 hypoglycemic and 15,851 hyperglycemic events detected through finger stick measurements. The Veo calibration algorithm decreased the overall mean absolute relative difference by greater than 0.25 to 15.89%, with hypoglycemia sensitivity increased from 54.9% in the PRT to 82.3% in the Veo (90.5% with predictive alerts); however, hyperglycemia sensitivity was decreased only marginally from 86% in the PRT to 81.7% in the Veo. Conclusions: The Veo calibration algorithm, with sensor error reduced significantly in the 40- to 120-mg/dl range, improves hypoglycemia detection, while retaining accuracy at high glucose levels.

[1]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[2]  Mari Palta,et al.  Glycemic Control in Early IDDM , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[3]  M Palta,et al.  Glycemic control in early IDDM. The Wisconsin Diabetes Registry. , 1992, Diabetes care.

[4]  Michael O'Grady,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Richard W Grant,et al.  Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[6]  Malgorzata E. Wilinska,et al.  The artificial pancreas: making headway , 2007 .

[7]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Accuracy of the SEVEN® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: Comparison with Frequently Sampled Venous Glucose Measurements , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  J. Mastrototaro,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring used to adjust diabetes therapy improves glycosylated hemoglobin: a pilot study. , 1999, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[9]  L Heinemann,et al.  Subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring: feasibility of a new microdialysis-based glucose sensor system. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[10]  J. Wylie-Rosett,et al.  Implementation of Treatment Protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[11]  R. Brazg,et al.  Accuracy of the 5-Day FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[12]  D. B. Keenan,et al.  Delays in Minimally Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices: A Review of Current Technology , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[13]  J. Mastrototaro,et al.  Performance evaluation of the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system during patient home use. , 2000, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[14]  John M. Lachin,et al.  Sustained effect of intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus on development and progression of diabetic nephropathy: the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. , 2003, JAMA.

[15]  L. Gonder-Frederick,et al.  A critical review of the literature on fear of hypoglycemia in diabetes: Implications for diabetes management and patient education. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[16]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[17]  W. Tamborlane,et al.  Impaired insulin action in puberty. A contributing factor to poor glycemic control in adolescents with diabetes. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Christopher G. Parkin,et al.  Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[19]  Howard Wolpert,et al.  Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes , 2009 .

[20]  F. Ovalle,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009 .

[21]  Rajiv V Shah,et al.  Clinical experience with an integrated continuous glucose sensor/insulin pump platform: A feasibility study , 2006, Advances in therapy.