A PHD filter with negative binomial clutter

The Probability Hypothesis Density (PHD) filter has brought significant advances in multi-object estimation since it not only estimates the spatial distribution of a population of objects but also provides estimates about the actual object number which is unknown in many scenarios. However, strict assumptions have to be made for the framework to be practical, in particular through the choice of the distribution for target and false alarm numbers. The exponential form of the Poisson distribution, for example, offers great simplicity in the derivation of the filter, but in many applications, this assumption is very restrictive, e.g. when there is a lot of variability in the number of measurements. This paper introduces a variation of the original PHD filter which assumes a negative binomial distribution for the false alarm number. It will be demonstrated that the altered formulation of the filter simply leads to an additional factor in the update equation and that the original PHD filter is a special case of the proposed method. A Gaussian Mixture (GM) implementation of both filters is used to test and compare their performance on simulated data.

[1]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  Faa di Bruno's formula for chain differentials , 2013, 1310.2833.

[2]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  CPHD Filtering With Unknown Clutter Rate and Detection Profile , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Ronald P. S. Mahler,et al.  Statistical Multisource-Multitarget Information Fusion , 2007 .

[4]  Lena Jaeger,et al.  Loss Models: From Data to Decisions , 2006 .

[5]  Ba-Tuong Vo,et al.  An improved CPHD filter for unknown clutter backgrounds , 2014, Defense + Security Symposium.

[6]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[7]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  A few calculus rules for chain differentials , 2015, 1506.08626.

[8]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  Analytic Implementations of the Cardinalized Probability Hypothesis Density Filter , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  R. Mahler Multitarget Bayes filtering via first-order multitarget moments , 2003 .

[10]  S. Watts Radar sea clutter: Recent progress and future challenges , 2008 .

[11]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  The Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density Filter , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Jeffrey D. Scargle,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, Vol. I: Elementary Theory and Methods , 2004, Technometrics.

[13]  Fritz Lettenmeyer Über die sogenannte Hospitalsche Regel. , 1936 .

[14]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[15]  R. Howe,et al.  ON CLASSICAL INVARIANT THEORY , 2010 .

[16]  Daniel E. Clark,et al.  Generalized PHD filters via a general chain rule , 2012, 2012 15th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[17]  Ba-Ngu Vo,et al.  Adaptive Target Birth Intensity for PHD and CPHD Filters , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[18]  Pierre Bernhard,et al.  Chain differentials with an application to the mathematical fear operator , 2005 .

[19]  Murat Üney,et al.  Regional Variance for Multi-Object Filtering , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  Thia Kirubarajan,et al.  Integrated Clutter Estimation and Target Tracking using Poisson Point Processes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.