Measures of Prägnanz?

Summary Prägnanz was suggested by Max Wertheimer in the 1920s as subsuming all “Laws of Gestalt” as they apply to visual awareness. Thus, it assumes a prominent position in any account of Gestalt phenomena. From a phenomenological perspective, some visual stimuli evidently “have more Prägnanz” than others, so Prägnanz seems to be an intensive quality. Here, we investigate the intricacies that need to be faced on the way to a definition of formal scales. Such measures naturally depend both upon the stimulus and upon the observer. Structural complexity bottlenecks of visual systems play a role, as well as the relevance to biological fitness, that is the affinity to the optical user interface. This positions the notion of Prägnanz squarely within the realm of biology. Indeed, the familiar “releasers” of ethology are singular cases of extremely high Prägnanz.

[1]  Rupert Riedl,et al.  Biology of Knowledge: The Evolutionary Basis of Reason , 1984 .

[2]  Max Wertheimer,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt , 2017 .

[3]  Johann Wolfgang von Goethe,et al.  Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären , 1973 .

[4]  J. Wood,et al.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[5]  H. Evans.  The Study of Instinct , 1952 .

[6]  Paul Gewirtz,et al.  On “I Know It When I See It” , 1996 .

[7]  Emanuel Leeuwenberg,et al.  Structural Information Theory: The Simplicity of Visual Form , 2012 .

[8]  J. Uexküll.  Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere , 1921 .

[9]  K. Lorenz.  Die Rückseite des Spiegels : Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens , 1973 .

[10]  W. Metzger.  Gesetze des Sehens , 1937 .

[11]  W. Richards,et al.  Perception as Bayesian Inference , 2008 .

[12]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Visual Agnosia, 2nd Ed. , 2005 .

[13]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[14]  Rens Bod,et al.  A Unified Model of Structural Organization in Language and Music , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[15]  E. Brunswik,et al.  Ecological cue-validity of proximity and of other Gestalt factors. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  D. Rentz,et al.  BEETLES ON THE BOTTLE: MALE BUPRESTIDS MISTAKE STUBBIES FOR FEMALES (COLEOPTERA) , 1983 .

[17]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[18]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Object Categorization: The Interface Theory of Perception: Natural Selection Drives True Perception to Swift Extinction , 2009 .

[19]  Zurek,et al.  Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[20]  F. Riffert.  Mind and Nature: Essays on Time and Subjectivity , 2003 .

[21]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  G. A. Miller.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[24]  S. F. Checkosky,et al.  Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  A. Kolmogorov.  Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information , 1968 .

[26]  T. B. Rogers,et al.  Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept , 2002 .

[27]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[28]  R. Feynman.  The Character of Physical Law , 1965 .

[29]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Vision as a user interface , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[31]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Visual agnosia, 2nd ed. , 2004 .

[32]  David K. Dirlam,et al.  Most efficient chunk sizes , 1972 .

[33]  J. Searle.  Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind , 1983 .

[34]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis: A Probabilistic Approach , 2007 .

[35]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1988, Dialogue.

[36]  J. Koenderink.  The All Seeing Eye? , 2014, Perception.

[37]  W. Köhler.  Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand : eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung , 1920 .

[38]  D. Lewis.  Psychophysical and theoretical identifications , 1972 .

[39]  S. Marković,et al.  Symmetry, complexity and perceptual economy: Effects of minimum and maximum simplicity conditions , 2001 .

[40]  Jason W. Brown.  Mind and Nature: Essays on Time and Subjectivity , 2000 .

[41]  R. Hess.  Developmental sensory impairment: amblyopia or tarachopia? , 1982, Human neurobiology.

[42]  S F Chipman,et al.  Complexity and structure in visual patterns. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[43]  J. B. Uexküll,et al.  Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen : ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten , 1934 .

[44]  K. Lorenz.  Studies in animal and human behaviour , 1970 .

[45]  N. Tinbergen,et al.  The Study of Instinct , 1953 .