Quantitative evaluation of a rotary blueberry mechanical harvester using a miniature instrumented sphere

Southern highbush blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrids) are predominantly for the fresh market and, with a few exceptions, are hand harvested. Though mechanical harvesting systems are available for processed blueberries, low harvest efficiency and high fruit damage have limited their use for picking blueberries for fresh market. To improve the current machine harvester design, it is apparent that the interaction between the machine harvester and fruit should be well understood. The goal of this study was, therefore, to provide such an understanding by using a custom-made miniature instrumented sphere. The miniature Berry Impact Recording Device (BIRD) was used to measure the mechanical impacts created by a rotary mechanical harvester during fruit harvesting. A closeup video recorded the harvesting to pinpoint critical control points where most impacts were created. The results showed that the catch plates on the rotary harvester accounted for over 30% of all mechanical impacts imposed on the BIRD, followed by the empty fruit collection box (lug) (>20%). Impacts created by the conveyer belt and shaking rods combined accounted for only 25% of mechanical impacts. Thus, the most significant reduction in bruising could be achieved through modifications in the catch plates and lugs. The impact of three contacting surfaces (the catch plates, conveyer belt, and steel tunnel) on the harvester and three commercial padding materials (Cellular Silicone, Slow Rebound, and No Bruze) were evaluated. Harvester surface evaluations revealed that the catch plate was the hardest surface. Among the three padding materials evaluated, the Cellular Silicone provided the best cushioning. This study proved the efficacy of using a customized miniature instrumented sphere in measuring mechanical impacts created by various machine parts during harvesting. It provided a better understanding of how the berries interact with different machine parts of a rotary harvester.

[1]  G. K. Brown,et al.  Apple Impact Damage Thresholds , 1992 .

[2]  G. K. Brown,et al.  SIMULATED PACKING LINE IMPACTS FOR APPLE BRUISE PREDICTION , 1990 .

[3]  G. K. Brown,et al.  Estimates of mechanization effects on fresh blueberry quality , 1996 .

[4]  D. R. Bower,et al.  Application of Vibrational Sorting to Blueberry Firmness Separation , 1976 .

[5]  Fumiomi Takeda,et al.  Assessment of the v45 blueberry harvester on rabbiteye blueberry and southern highbush blueberry pruned to V-shaped canopy , 2008 .

[6]  Bart Nicolai,et al.  Instrumented sphere prediction of tomato stem-puncture injury , 2004 .

[7]  R. B. Fridley,et al.  Application of Theory of Elasticity to the Design of Fruit Harvesting and Handling Equipment for Minimum Bruising , 1972 .

[8]  Changying Li,et al.  Development of the Berry Impact Recording Device sensing system: Software , 2011 .

[9]  Bernd Herold,et al.  Mechanical Load and its Effect on Bulb Onions due to Harvest and Post-harvest Handling , 1998 .

[10]  G. H. Brusewitz,et al.  Peach Bruise Thresholds Using the Instrumented Sphere , 1994 .

[11]  G. M. Hyde,et al.  POTATO IMPACT DAMAGE THRESHOLDS , 1997 .

[12]  K. B. van Dalfsen,et al.  YIELD FROM HAND AND MECHANICAL HARVESTING OF HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRIES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1999 .

[13]  Changying Li,et al.  Development of the Berry Impact Recording Device sensing system: Hardware design and calibration , 2011 .

[14]  R. B. Fridley,et al.  Factors Affecting Impact Injury to Mechanically Harvested Fruit , 1964 .

[15]  Herman Ramon,et al.  Characterisation of a potato-shaped instrumented device , 2003 .

[16]  Martin Geyer,et al.  A PRESSURE MEASURING SPHERE FOR MONITORING HANDLING OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLES , 1996 .

[17]  Bernadine C. Strik,et al.  Blueberry Production Trends in North America, 1992 to 2003, and Predictions for Growth , 2005 .