Effects of release time and directionality on unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fittings in complex sound fields.

In studies to date, the effectiveness of the directional microphone has been investigated independently of the signal processing scheme used in the hearing aid. In addition, the number and placement of the background noise speakers can create an advantage for a particular polar pattern (i.e., cardioid, supercardioid, and hypercardioid) in any laboratory design. With these considerations in mind, the purpose of this investigation was twofold: (1) to determine the effect of different amplitude-compression release times on speech perception ability in noise, measured with directional microphone hearing aids, and (2) to determine the impact of environment (classroom vs anechoic chamber) on those measures. Ten subjects with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss participated. Using an eight-speaker complex sound field, speech perception was assessed in an anechoic chamber and a typical classroom environment. None of the release times resulted in superior performance in either the anechoic or classroom environment.

[1]  R A Bentler,et al.  Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M Valente,et al.  Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. , 1995, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  T Ricketts,et al.  Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Michael Valente,et al.  Hearing AIDS: Standards, Options, and Limitations , 1996 .

[6]  H Levitt,et al.  The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Harald Sander,et al.  The Production of a Spatially Limited 'Diffuse' Sound Field in an Anechoic Room , 1987 .

[8]  H Levitt,et al.  Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R A Bentler,et al.  Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I: Objective measures. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Barry A. Freeman,et al.  Amplification in Education , 1981 .

[11]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[12]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[13]  Michael Valente The bright promise of microphone technology , 1998 .

[14]  Ruth A. Bentler,et al.  Assessing Release-Time Options in a Two-Channel AGC Hearing Aid , 1997 .

[15]  T. Anderson,et al.  Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments , 1997 .

[16]  R C Seewald,et al.  Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.