Clomiphene based ovarian stimulation in a commercial donor program

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare an extended clomiphene-based ovarian stimulation regimen with the conventional antagonist protocol in donor-recipient cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 170 (N) donors were stimulated between January 2013 and December 2013. Conventional antagonist protocol (group I) was employed in (n1 = 31) cycles, and clomiphene was used in (n2 = 139) donor cycles (group II). 50 mg clomiphene was given simultaneously with gonadotropins from day 2 of the cycle until the day of trigger. The analysis was performed retrospectively for oocytes retrieved, fertilization rates, cycle cancelation, blastocyst formation, and pregnancy rates. The dosages, cost, and terminal E2 (estradiol) were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The donor age groups were comparable in both the groups. There were no unsuccessful egg retrievals with clomiphene. The pregnancy rate (positive beta human chorionic gonadotropin) was significantly higher in the clomiphene group (odds ratio: 2.453; P = 0.02). Similarly, fertilization rate was significantly higher in the clomiphene group (59.5/50.5, P = 0.04). Eggs retrieved were similar in both groups, but the terminal E2 was significantly higher in the clomiphene group (P = 0.001). Average gonadotropin used was also significantly lower in clomiphene group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Clomiphene can effectively prevent luteinizing hormone surge and limit the dose of gonadotropins thus bringing down the costs and its negative impact on the endometrium and oocyte quality.

[1]  D. Bodri,et al.  Minimal ovarian stimulation combined with elective single embryo transfer policy: age-specific results of a large, single-centre, Japanese cohort , 2012, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology.

[2]  B. Heng,et al.  Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles yield higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared with fresh blastocyst transfer cycles--time for a new embryo transfer strategy? , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  M. Bahçeci,et al.  Ovulation triggering with GnRH agonist vs. hCG in the same egg donor population undergoing donor oocyte cycles with GnRH antagonist: a prospective randomized cross-over trial , 2009, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[4]  A. Moghadamnia,et al.  Single‐Dose Pharmacokinetic Study of Clomiphene Citrate Isomers in Anovular Patients With Polycystic Ovary Disease , 2009, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[5]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[6]  O. Kato,et al.  Minimal ovarian stimulation with clomiphene citrate: a large-scale retrospective study. , 2007, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[7]  O. Kato,et al.  P-751: The effectiveness of clomiphene citrate in suppressing the LH surge in the minimal stimulation IVF protocol , 2006 .

[8]  B. Fauser,et al.  A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. , 2003, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[9]  L. Plouffe,et al.  A pharmacological review of selective oestrogen receptor modulators. , 2000, Human reproduction update.

[10]  Dk Gardner,et al.  In-vitro culture of human blastocysts , 1999 .

[11]  P. Kroboth,et al.  Single-dose pharmacokinetics of clomiphene citrate in normal volunteers. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.