Keyboard and mouse errors due to motor disabilities

There are many people who find the standard computer input devices?the keyboard and mouse?difficult to use due to a motor disability. A number of keyboard and mouse configuration options designed to overcome physical difficulties exist. However, formal empirical evaluation of such facilities is rare. There is, in fact, little data available on the precise nature of physical difficulties with input devices. Hence, it is difficult to gauge the adequacy of existing access provision. This paper presents an empirical study of the keyboard and mouse errors encountered in a sample of 20 computer users with motor disabilities, and six without disabilities. Six important classes of keyboard difficulty are identified, involving significant correction time for participants with disabilities. Difficulties with all aspects of mouse usage were observed, particularly pointing and dragging. Many of the difficulties observed would be amenable to automatic detection. It is hoped that these results will help to inform the development of more accessible software and hardware.

[1]  Sharon Glennen,et al.  The handbook of augmentative and alternative communication , 1997 .

[2]  James L. Peterson,et al.  Computer programs for detecting and correcting spelling errors , 1980, CACM.

[3]  P L Weiss,et al.  A human factors approach to adapted access device prescription and customization. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  William L. Bewley,et al.  Human factors testing in the design of Xerox's 8010 “Star” office workstation , 1983, CHI '83.

[5]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Design rules based on analyses of human error , 1983, CACM.

[6]  Shari Trewin,et al.  A Study of Two Keyboard Aids to Accessibility , 1998, BCS HCI.

[7]  Dennis E. Egan,et al.  Individual Differences In Human-Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[8]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  The evaluation of text editors: methodology and empirical results. , 1983, CACM.

[9]  A. Edwards.  Extra-ordinary human-computer interaction: interfaces for users with disabilities , 1995 .

[10]  Kathy S. Lee,et al.  Control of computer-based technology for people with physical disabilities : an assessment manual , 1990 .

[11]  Shari Trewin.  InputLogger: General-purpose logging of keyboard and mouse events on an Apple Macintosh , 1998 .

[12]  H H Koester,et al.  Learning and performance of able-bodied individuals using scanning systems with and without word prediction. , 1994, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[13]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging? , 1990, CHI '90.

[14]  William W. McMillan,et al.  Computing for users with special needs and models of computer-human interaction , 1992, CHI.

[15]  Joseph J. Lazzaro.  Adapting PCs for Disabilities , 1995 .

[16]  Carl Brown,et al.  Assistive technology computers and persons with disabilities , 1992, CACM.

[17]  C. Riviere,et al.  Effects of age and disability on tracking tasks with a computer mouse: accuracy and linearity. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Fred J. Damerau,et al.  A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors , 1964, CACM.

[19]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  A Glossary of Terms Including a Classification of Typing Errors , 1983 .

[20]  Shari Trewin,et al.  A model of keyboard configuration requirements , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[21]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Prediction of Pointing and Dragging Times in Graphical User Interfaces , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[22]  Allen Newell,et al.  The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems , 1980, CACM.

[23]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks , 1991, CHI.

[24]  Jonathan T. Grudin,et al.  Error Patterns in Novice and Skilled Transcription Typing , 1983 .

[25]  Kanichi Takagi,et al.  Human error and human reliability , 1967 .