Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city's Master plan: A case of Urban Underground Space use

Abstract The paper offers an analysis of Urban Underground Space (UUS) use and its influence on cities’ sustainability. It has been widely recognized that urban land is a valuable resource. During recent decades UUS, especially in big cities, has become a scarce and valuable resource. This paper outlines UUS use, including some quantitative descriptors and an analysis of its historical evolution. Historic top-down development of Urban Underground Infrastructure (UUI) and shortcomings in its planning have resulted in a lack of available UUS for new developments. A sectoral approach to UUS development and UUS availability on a first-come-first-served basis does not allow the full benefits that UUI can provide for urban sustainability. This paper recognizes UUS as a valuable non-renewable resource, which requires careful consideration during city planning. It focuses on the need and opportunities for mainstreaming UUS into cities’ Master plans. To facilitate this, UUS services are listed and classified; their characteristics are identified and discussed. UUS users are also identified and possible conflicts between them are discussed. State-of-the-art consideration of UUS in cities’ Master plans is critically analyzed and suggestions are made for mainstreaming UUS and sustainability issues into Master plans. It is recommended that the following are implemented: three-dimensional planning; prioritizing UUS services; studying prospective functional and spatial interrelations between different types of infrastructures; and integrated assessment.

[1]  Nikolai Bobylev.  SUSTAINABILITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE , 2007 .

[2]  Nikolai Bobylev,et al.  Urbanization and Environmental Security , 2008 .

[3]  J. Boyd,et al.  What are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units , 2006 .

[4]  J.B.M. Admiraal.  A bottom-up approach to the planning of underground space , 2006 .

[5]  Chung-Sik Yoo,et al.  Safety in the underground space - Proceedings of the ITA-AITES 2006 World Tunnel Congress and 32nd ITA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea, 22-27 April 2006 , 2006 .

[6]  Nikolai Bobylev,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment of urban underground infrastructure development policies , 2006 .

[7]  Vincent Nadin,et al.  Town and country planning in the UK , 1988 .

[8]  A. Erdem.  Subterranean space use in Cappadocia: The Uchisar example , 2008 .

[9]  B. Cullingworth,et al.  Town and country planning in the UK 13th edition , 2006 .

[10]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species , 1981 .

[11]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Managing Critical Infrastructure Risks , 2007 .

[12]  B. Fisher,et al.  Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation , 2008 .

[13]  W. Westman.  How Much Are Nature's Services Worth? , 1977, Science.

[14]  F. V. Dunkel.  Underground and earth sheltered food storage: historical, geographic, and economic considerations , 1985 .

[15]  Aurèle Parriaux,et al.  Underground resources and sustainable development in urban areas , 2006 .

[16]  Michael Barker,et al.  Legal and administrative issues in underground space use: a preliminary survey of ITA member nations , 1991 .

[17]  W. Wende,et al.  Requirements of the SEA Directive and the German Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan , 2004 .

[18]  Miguel P. Romo,et al.  The sinking of Mexico City: Its effects on soil properties and seismic response , 2007 .

[19]  Aurèle Parriaux,et al.  The DEEP CITY Project: A Global Concept for a Sustainable Urban Underground Management , 2007 .