The effects of simulated cataract on reading with normal vision and simulated central scotoma

Reading rates are slower for persons with low vision than for normally-sighted persons. This study investigated the change in reading performance and reading eye movements when we simulated the two most common causes of low vision--central field loss and cataract--and their combination (scotoma + cataract). Three subjects read sentences with each of these simulated impairments at five different letter sizes. They required larger letters to read with the cataract or scotoma than they did with normal vision, and larger still to read with scotoma + cataract; the change in eye movements relative to normal vision was similar across conditions. When reading large letters (1.61 degrees), the cataract had almost no effect, while the scotoma and scotoma + cataract reduced reading rate for two of the subjects. The cataract had a greater impact on performance relative to normal vision for these same two subjects, while for the third subject the cataract had a greater impact with the scotoma in place. Cataract extraction tends to be postponed in patients with central field loss because it is not perceived to be beneficial. The findings from this study, as well as others, suggest that patients with central field loss would benefit from cataract extraction.

[1]  L. Wachtmeister,et al.  The impact of cataract surgery on low vision patients. A population based study. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[2]  G. Rubin,et al.  Fixation patterns and reading rates in eyes with central scotomas from advanced atrophic age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[3]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—II. Low vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[6]  P. Aspinall,et al.  Do patients with age related maculopathy and cataract benefit from cataract surgery? , 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Snodderly.  Effects of light and dark environments on macaque and human fixational eye movements , 1987, Vision Research.

[8]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. VI—The role of contrast in low vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[10]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Reading with simulated scotomas: attending to the right is better than attending to the left , 1999, Vision Research.

[11]  H D Crane,et al.  Generation-V dual-Purkinje-image eyetracker. , 1985, Applied optics.

[12]  Gary S Rubin,et al.  Reading with central field loss: number of letters masked is more important than the size of the mask in degrees , 1999, Vision Research.

[13]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  E M Fine,et al.  Effects of cataract and scotoma on visual acuity: a simulation study. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  I L Bailey,et al.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  H D Crane,et al.  Accurate simulation of visual scotomas in normal subjects. , 1983, Applied optics.

[18]  H. Blanchard,et al.  The acquisition of parafoveal word information in reading , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. G. Strong,et al.  Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  H R Taylor,et al.  A comparison of two photographic systems for grading cataract. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  G. Rubin,et al.  Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.