Specific features of the Italian section of the ERSPC

1 Randomization: subjects are randomized before informed consent. An updated residence database is currently available from the Florence municipality. The whole target resident population has been randomized, not only consenting volunteers. This is a difference from most ERSPC active centres adopting randomization of consenting volunteers 2 The criteria prompting a diagnostic assessment. (i) the PSA threshold for sextant random biopsy remained at 4 ng/mL, as in the original ERSPC protocol, whereas in other ERSPC active centres the threshold was reduced to 3 ng/mL. (ii) a PSA level of ≥ 2.5 ng/ mL prompts a DRE and TRUS, with a directed biopsy of any DRE and TRUS abnormalities in the 2.5–4 ng/mL PSA range. The 2.5 ng/mL threshold was adopted, as all cancers detected in the original pilot studied were within this PSA limit [4]. 3 Biopsy technique: the biopsy approach is transperineal rather than transrectal, as in all other ERSPC active centres. An ERSPC study showed that the transperineal approach is not inferior, but possibly superior to the transrectal as far as sensitivity is concerned [5].

[1]  A. Ferriman Health department to improve investigation of waiting list fiddles , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Zosia Kmietowiz Health Secretary Milburn refuses to renegotiate contract , 2002 .

[3]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Determining the Sensitivity of Transrectal Ultrasonography on a Consecutive Series of Prostate Cancers in a Clinical and Screening Setting , 2002, Tumori.

[4]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Analysis of PSA velocity in 1666 healthy subjects undergoing total PSA determination at two consecutive screening rounds. , 2002, The International journal of biological markers.

[5]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Transperineal sonography guided biopsy of the prostate: critical review of 1107 cases. , 2002, La Radiologia medica.

[6]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Large‐scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[7]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Predicting Prostate Biopsy Outcome by Findings at Digital Rectal Examination, Transrectal Ultrasonography, PSA, PSA Density and Free-To-Total PSA Ratio in a Population-Based Screening Setting , 2001, The International journal of biological markers.

[8]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Prostate cancer: different incidence but not mortality trends within two areas of Tuscany, Italy. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer: a comparative study of the diagnostic efficacy of sextant transrectal versus sextant transperineal biopsy. , 2000, Urology.

[10]  S. Ciatto Screening for Prostate Cancer by PSA Determination: A Time for Caution , 2000, The International journal of biological markers.

[11]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Prostate cancer screening: the problem of overdiagnosis and lessons to be learned from breast cancer screening. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[12]  S. Andriole,et al.  Rationale for randomised trials of prostate cancer screening. The International Prostate Screening Trial Evaluation Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[13]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Overdiagnosis of prostate carcinoma by screening: an estimate based on the results of the Florence Screening Pilot Study. , 1998, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Comparing Two Modalities of Screening for Prostate Cancer: Digital Rectal Examination + Transrectal Ultrasonography Vs. Prostate-Specific Antigen , 1995, Tumori.

[15]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Guaiac and immunochemical tests for faecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  M. Cogni,et al.  Diagnosi Precoce Del Carcinoma Prostatico , 1991 .

[17]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Cervical Cancer Screening in Tuscany: A Survey of the Actual State of Cervical Cancer Prevention in the Local Sanitary Units of the Tuscan Region , 1988, Tumori.

[18]  Stefano Ciatto,et al.  A case‐control study of the efficacy of a non‐randomized breast cancer screening program in florence (Italy) , 1986, International journal of cancer.