Production quantity and specification limits settings by considering specified process capability value

In the present paper, we propose a modified Kouikoglou and Phillis’s produce-to-stock system with a the specified process capability index value under the partly loss sales or complete backlogging. The economic specification limits, specified process capability value, output quantity, and incoming order are jointly determined by maximizing the expected total profit of product. Hundred percent inspection is executed before the products are shipped to the customer. The finite output buffer (production quantity) and rejection of incoming order are also considered in our model. Assuming that the target value of product characteristic is equal to its specification center, the Taguchi’s asymmetric quadratic quality loss function is applied to evaluate the product quality. From the above numerical examples and sensitivity analysis of parameters, the results suggest that one can adopt the modified Kouikoglou and Phillis’s produce-to-stock system under the complete backlogging. If the produce-to-stock system under the partly loss sales, then one should use the original Kouikoglou and Phillis’s model for obtaining the larger expected total profit of product than that of modified one.

[1]  D. Grau On the Choice of a Capability Index for Asymmetric Tolerances , 2010 .

[2]  Yannis A. Phillis,et al.  Design of product specifications and control policies in a single-stage production system , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[3]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Distributional and Inferential Properties of Process Capability Indices , 1992 .

[4]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Process Capability Indices , 1993 .

[5]  Fred A. Spiring,et al.  A New Measure of Process Capability: Cpm , 1988 .

[6]  Muhammad Riaz,et al.  On the generalized process capability under simple and mixture models , 2014 .

[7]  Jianbiao Pan,et al.  Optimization of engineering tolerance design using revised loss functions , 2009 .

[8]  Chia-Huang Wu,et al.  Supplier Selection for Multiple-Characteristics Processes with One-Sided Specifications , 2013 .

[9]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  ECONOMIC DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS , 1994 .

[10]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Economic design of the specification region for multiple quality characteristics , 1996 .

[11]  Abbas Parchami,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Capability Testing Based on Cpk with Multiple Samples , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[12]  Guo Jin-li,et al.  A New Measure of Process Capability , 2008 .

[13]  Russell A. Boyles,et al.  The Taguchi capability index , 1991 .

[14]  Kailash C. Kapur,et al.  Economic Design of Specifications for 100% Inspection with Imperfect Measurement Systems , 2006 .

[15]  James J. Filliben,et al.  Taguchi's fixed-element arrays are fractional factorials , 1991 .

[16]  Kailash C. Kapur AN APPROACH FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT , 1988 .

[17]  Sudhansu S. Maiti,et al.  On Generalizing Process Capability Indices , 2010 .

[18]  Daniel Grau,et al.  Process Yield, Process Centering and Capability Indices for One-Sided Tolerance Processes , 2012 .

[19]  Kailash C. Kapur,et al.  Economic development of specifications for 100% inspection based on asymmetric quality loss functions , 2006 .

[20]  Hsu-Hua Lee,et al.  The Linkage of Process Capability without Target Value on the Center in Six Sigma Management , 2013 .

[21]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Introduction to quality engineering.... , 2014 .