Category-based Applications and Extensions in Advertising: Motivating More Extensive Ad Processing

Consumers watch a television ad at different levels depending on their motivation to process the ad. In this article, the fit between an ad and an evoked ad schema in memory is hypothesized to influence consumers' motivation to process. It is also hypothesized that this motivation is moderated by effects due to consumers' prior category affect and processing goals. Results from an advertising experiment suggest that ads typical of an evoked schema elicit relatively less extensive processing and evaluations, while those atypical of the schema motivate more extensive processing and evaluations. In an extension of previous research in the domain, the results imply that typicality effects are moderated by the extremity of prior category affect. Limited evidence also reveals that typicality effects may be moderated by ad-processing goals. The theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

[1]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[2]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[3]  A. Isen,et al.  Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. , 1984 .

[4]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[5]  Meryl P Gardner,et al.  Low Involvement Strategies for Processing Advertisements , 1985 .

[6]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Consumer Expectations on Information Processing in Selling Encounters , 1986 .

[7]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[8]  M. Sujan,et al.  Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising , 1987 .

[9]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements , 1987 .

[10]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[11]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative Framework , 1989 .

[12]  M. Hewstone Changing Stereotypes with Disconfirming Information , 1989 .

[13]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[14]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[15]  A. Rao,et al.  The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review , 1989 .

[16]  J. Bettman,et al.  The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research , 1989 .

[17]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[18]  B. Loken,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality , 1990 .

[19]  M. Holbrook,et al.  Consumer Responses to Advertising: The Effects of Ad Content, Emotions, and Attitude toward the Ad on Viewing Time , 1991 .

[20]  Kevin Lane Keller Cue Compatibility and Framing in Advertising , 1991 .

[21]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[23]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads , 1991 .

[24]  Karen H. Smith,et al.  Some Effects of Schematic Processing on Consumer Expectations and Disconfirmation Judgments , 1992 .

[25]  Richard A. Spreng,et al.  How Does Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and Intentions , 1992 .

[26]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  A Study of Information Search Behavior during the Categorization of New Products , 1992 .

[27]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency? , 1992 .

[28]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[29]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .