Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.

Previous studies have found that mammographic breast density is highly correlated with breast cancer risk. Therefore, mammographic breast density may be considered as an important risk factor in studies of breast cancer treatments. In this paper, we evaluated the accuracy of using mammograms for estimating breast density by analyzing the correlation between the percent mammographic dense area and the percent glandular tissue volume as estimated from MR images. A dataset of 67 cases having MR images (coronal 3-D SPGR T1-weighted pre-contrast) and corresponding 4-view mammograms was used in this study. Mammographic breast density was estimated by an experienced radiologist and an automated image analysis tool, Mammography Density ESTimator (MDEST) developed previously in our laboratory. For the estimation of the percent volume of fibroglandular tissue in breast MR images, a semiautomatic method was developed to segment the fibroglandular tissue from each slice. The tissue volume was calculated by integration over all slices containing the breast. Interobserver variation was measured for 3 different readers. It was found that the correlation between every two of the three readers for segmentation of MR volumetric fibroglandular tissue was 0.99. The correlations between the percent volumetric fibroglandular tissue on MR images and the percent dense area of the CC and MLO views segmented by an experienced radiologist were both 0.91. The correlation between the percent volumetric fibroglandular tissue on MR images and the percent dense area of the CC and MLO views segmented by MDEST was 0.91 and 0.89, respectively. The root-mean-square (rms) residual ranged from 5.4% to 6.3%. The mean bias ranged from 3% to 6%. The high correlation indicates that changes in mammographic density may be a useful indicator of changes in fibroglandular tissue volume in the breast.

[1]  T. Sellers,et al.  Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States) , 2000, Cancer Causes & Control.

[2]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. , 1980, Radiology.

[3]  A. Morrison,et al.  Diet, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  H Rusinek,et al.  Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[6]  R. Egan,et al.  Breast cancer mammography patterns , 1977, Cancer.

[7]  M Lipkin,et al.  Genetic and nutritional modulation of colon cancer development. , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[8]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[10]  Ikuko Kato,et al.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States) , 1995, Cancer Causes & Control.

[11]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. , 2001, Medical physics.

[12]  N. Boyd,et al.  The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  E White,et al.  Variation in mammographic breast density by time in menstrual cycle among women aged 40-49 years. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  J. Norbeck,et al.  Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer , 1980, Cancer.

[15]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and mode of detection: implications for the breast screening programme , 1998, Journal of medical screening.

[17]  S Ciatto,et al.  A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[18]  P. Krook Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  N. Boyd,et al.  Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[22]  J N Wolfe The prominent duct pattern as an indicator of cancer risk. , 1969, Oncology.

[23]  John N. Wolfe,et al.  Mammography: Ducts as a Sole Indicator of Breast Carcinoma1 , 1967 .

[24]  R. Golfieri,et al.  Early-stage focal nodular hyperplasia: US/CT/MR features correlated with histology , 1994, European Radiology.

[25]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Dan Rico,et al.  A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms. , 2003, Medical physics.

[27]  N F Boyd,et al.  Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density , 1998, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[28]  M. Hakama,et al.  Is a dense mammographic parenchymal pattern a contraindication to hormonal replacement therapy? , 2000, Acta oncologica.

[29]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[30]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Mammographic Texture Analysis: An Evaluation Of Risk For Developing Breast Cancer , 1986 .

[31]  M. Pike,et al.  Changes in mammographic densities induced by a hormonal contraceptive designed to reduce breast cancer risk. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  S. J. Graham,et al.  Quantitative correlation of breast tissue parameters using magnetic resonance and X-ray mammography. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[33]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[34]  J J Heine,et al.  A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[35]  R. Prentice Breast mammographic changes among women adopting a low-fat eating pattern. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[36]  N. Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.