The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer.

The object of this article is to assess current staging accuracies for individual modalities and to investigate the influence of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on clinical staging accuracies and treatment selection for patients with gastro-esophageal cancer. Patients newly diagnosed with gastric or esophageal cancer and who were deemed suitable for surgical resection by the MDT were studied. Patients were staged with a combination of computerized tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Additionally, the MDT determined an overall clinical stage for each patient after discussion at the MDT meeting. Treatments were selected according to this final clinical stage. Final histopathological staging (pTNM) was available for all patients and was used as the gold standard for determining staging accuracy. Suitability of treatment selection was assessed once final pTNM was available. One hundred and eighteen patients were studied. Endoscopic ultrasound was the most accurate individual staging modality for the loco-regional assessment of esophageal tumors (T stage accuracy 78%, N stage accuracy 70%). Laparoscopic ultrasound was the most accurate modality in T staging of gastric cancers (91%). The MDT stage was more accurate than each individual staging modality for T and N staging for both gastric and esophageal cancers (accuracy range: 88-89%) and was better for the assessment of nodal disease than each individual modality (CT P < 0.001, EUS P < 0.01, LUS P < 0.01). Overall staging accuracy as determined at the MDT meeting was increased and resulted in only 2/118 (2%) patients being under-treated. The MDT significantly improves staging accuracy for gastro-esophageal cancer and ensures that correct management decisions are made for the highest number of individual patients.

[1]  J. Shenfine,et al.  Pattern of recurrence following subtotal oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  H. Stein,et al.  Evaluation of endosonography in TN staging of oesophageal cancer. , 1991, Gut.

[3]  P. Allan,et al.  Laparoscopic ultrasonography for staging gastroesophageal cancer. , 1997, Surgery.

[4]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Histopathologic Validation of Lymph Node Staging With FDG-PET Scan in Cancer of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction: A Prospective Study Based on Primary Surgery With Extensive Lymphadenectomy , 2000, Annals of surgery.

[5]  C. Low,et al.  Computed tomography for oesophageal carcinoma: its value to the surgeon. , 1992, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[6]  M. Clague,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness in the management of patients with oesophageal cancer , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  W. Vaalburg,et al.  Positron emission tomography for staging of oesophageal and gastroesophageal malignancy. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  W. Meyers,et al.  Gastric adenocarcinoma: CT versus surgical staging. , 1988, Radiology.

[9]  P. Dupont,et al.  Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Farndon,et al.  Quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. , 2000, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[11]  O. Garden,et al.  Role of laparoscopic ultrasonography in the management of patients with oesophagogastric cancer , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[12]  D. Alderson,et al.  Oesophageal cancer staging using endoscopic ultrasonography , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  G Gamsu,et al.  CT of the pretracheal retrocaval space. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  G. Tytgat,et al.  Endosonography and computed tomography of esophageal carcinoma. Preoperative classification compared to the new (1987) TNM system. , 1989, Gastroenterology.

[15]  H. Stein,et al.  Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  R. Hawes,et al.  Esophageal cancer staging: improved accuracy by endoscopic ultrasound of celiac lymph nodes. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  P. Allan,et al.  A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. , 2002, European journal of radiology.

[18]  D. Girling Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[19]  K. Sirinek,et al.  Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma. Abdominal computed tomography does not replace celiotomy. , 1986, Archives of surgery.

[20]  J. Gibbons,et al.  Does preoperative computed tomography scanning aid assessment of oesophageal carcinoma? , 1990, Postgraduate medical journal.

[21]  A. Zauber,et al.  Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. , 1991, Radiology.