Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change.

Measurement of sensitivity to differences in the rate of change of auditory signal parameters is complicated by confounds among duration, extent, and velocity of the changing signal. Dooley and Moore [(1988) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84(4), 1332-1337] proposed a method for measuring sensitivity to rate of change using a duration discrimination task. They reported improved duration discrimination when an additional intensity or frequency change cue was present. The current experiments were an attempt to use this method to measure sensitivity to the rate of change in intensity and spatial position. Experiment 1 investigated whether duration discrimination was enhanced when additional cues of rate of intensity change, rate of spatial position change, or both were provided. Experiment 2 determined whether participant listening experience or the testing environment influenced duration discrimination task performance. Experiment 3 assessed whether duration discrimination could be used to measure sensitivity to rates of changes in intensity and spatial position for stimuli with lower rates of change, as well as emphasizing the constancy of the velocity cue. Results of these experiments showed that duration discrimination was impaired rather than enhanced by the additional velocity cues. The findings are discussed in terms of the demands of listening to concurrent changes along multiple auditory dimensions.

[1]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Populations of auditory cortical neurons can accurately encode acoustic space across stimulus intensity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  John E. Schlerf,et al.  Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Ewan A. Macpherson,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex , 2008, Hearing Research.

[4]  G L Romani,et al.  A frontoparietal network for spatial attention reorienting in the auditory domain: a human fMRI/MEG study of functional and temporal dynamics. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Katrin Krumbholz,et al.  Feature- and Object-based Attentional Modulation in the Human Auditory Where Pathway , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Tomasz Kaczmarek,et al.  Auditory perception of sound source velocity. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. Zatorre,et al.  A Functional Neuroimaging Study of Sound Localization: Visual Cortex Activity Predicts Performance in Early-Blind Individuals , 2005, PLoS biology.

[8]  J. Lorenceau,et al.  Crossmodal integration for perception and action , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[9]  D. Grantham,et al.  Auditory spatial resolution in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal planes. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory space processing: here, there or everywhere? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Carlile,et al.  Discrimination of sound source velocity in human listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Shigeto Furukawa,et al.  Book Review: Cortical Neurons That Localize Sounds , 2002, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[14]  Matti Karjalainen,et al.  Localization of Amplitude-Panned Virtual Sources I: Stereophonic Panning , 2001 .

[15]  R. Schlauch,et al.  Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  Perceptual bias for rising tones , 1998, Nature.

[17]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Codes for sound-source location in nontonotopic auditory cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  R. Lutfi,et al.  Correlational analysis of acoustic cues for the discrimination of auditory motion. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on measures of auditory duration discrimination. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  D R Perrott,et al.  Discrimination of moving events which accelerate or decelerate over the listening interval. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Chandler Dw,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity. , 1992 .

[22]  T N Buell,et al.  Combination of binaural information across frequency bands. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle: marking the end points of the path traveled by a moving sound source. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  Duration discrimination of steady and gliding tones: a new method for estimating sensitivity to rate of change. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle as a function of signal frequency and the velocity of the source. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  L. Rosenblum,et al.  Relative Effectiveness of Three Stimulus Variables for Locating a Moving Sound Source , 1987, Perception.

[27]  D W Grantham,et al.  Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  T Z Strybel,et al.  Discrimination of relative distance in the auditory modality: the success and failure of the loudness discrimination hypothesis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  M Fernandes,et al.  Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  D. Perrott,et al.  Minimum auditory movement angle: binaural localization of moving sound sources. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  S M Abel,et al.  Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  J. Harris,et al.  Monaural-binaural minimum audible angles for a moving sound source. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  P. Coleman.  An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  A. Mills.  On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[36]  P. Andrés,et al.  The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and postnovelty distraction in young and older adults. , 2010, Experimental psychology.

[37]  D. M. Green,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.