Convolutional autoencoder for exposure effects equalization and noise mitigation in optical camera communication.

In rolling shutter-based optical camera communication (OCC), the camera's exposure time limits the achievable reception bandwidth. In long-exposure settings, the image sensor pixels average the incident received power, producing inter-symbol interference (ISI), which is perceived in the images as a spatial mixture of the symbol bands. Hence, the shortest possible exposure configuration should be selected to alleviate ISI. However, in these conditions, the camera produces dark images with impracticable light conditions for human or machine-supervised applications. In this paper, a novel convolutional autoencoder-based equalizer is proposed to alleviate exposure-related ISI and noise. Furthermore, unlike other systems that use artificial neural networks for equalization and decoding, the training procedure is conducted offline using synthetic images for which no prior information about the deployment scenario is used. Hence the training can be performed for a wide range of cameras and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions, using a vast number of samples, improving the network fitting and the system decoding robustness. The results obtained in the experimental validation record the highest ISI mitigation potential for Manchester encoded on-off keying signals. The system can mitigate the ISI produced by exposure time windows that are up to seven times longer than the transmission symbol duration, with bit error rates (BER) lower than 10-5 under optimal SNR conditions. Consequently, the reception bandwidth improves up to 14 times compared to non-equalized systems. In addition, under harsh SNRs conditions, the system achieves BERs below the forward error correction limit for 1dB and 5 dB while operating with exposure times that are 2 and 4 times greater than the symbol time, respectively.

[1]  R. Pérez-Jiménez,et al.  Correlation-based receiver for optical camera communications. , 2019, Optics express.

[2]  N. Zhang,et al.  Dielectric-Grating-Coupled Surface Plasmon Resonance From the Back Side of the Metal Film for Ultrasensitive Sensing , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[3]  Jenn-Kaie Lain,et al.  Non-Line-of-Sight Optical Camera Communication in a Heterogeneous Reflective Background , 2019, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[4]  Jenn-Kaie Lain,et al.  Experimental DCO-OFDM Optical Camera Communication Systems With a Commercial Smartphone Camera , 2019, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[5]  Zabih Ghassemlooy,et al.  Data Rate Enhancement in Optical Camera Communications Using an Artificial Neural Network Equaliser , 2020, IEEE Access.

[6]  Othman Isam Younus,et al.  The Utilization of Artificial Neural Network Equalizer in Optical Camera Communications † , 2021, Sensors.

[7]  Zabih Ghassemlooy,et al.  Non-line-of-sight 2 × N indoor optical camera communications. , 2018, Applied optics.

[8]  Sridhar Rajagopal,et al.  IEEE 802.15.7 visible light communication: modulation schemes and dimming support , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Mizuho Nishio,et al.  Convolutional auto-encoder for image denoising of ultra-low-dose CT , 2017, Heliyon.

[10]  Shoji Kawahito,et al.  A New Automotive VLC System Using Optical Communication Image Sensor , 2016, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[11]  Yang Liu,et al.  Rolling-shutter-effect camera-based visible light communication using RGB channel separation and an artificial neural network. , 2020, Optics express.

[12]  Elizabeth Eso,et al.  Experimentally Derived Feasibility of Optical Camera Communications under Turbulence and Fog Conditions , 2020, Sensors.

[13]  Zhengyuan Xu,et al.  Some practical constraints and solutions for optical camera communication , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[14]  Chi-Wai Chow,et al.  Long distance non-line-of-sight (NLOS) visible light signal detection based on rolling-shutter-patterning of mobile-phone camera. , 2017, Optics express.

[15]  Yeong Min Jang,et al.  Convolutional neural networkscheme–based optical camera communication system for intelligent Internet of vehicles , 2018, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[16]  Yeong Min Jang,et al.  A survey of design and implementation for optical camera communication , 2017, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[17]  Zabih Ghassemlooy,et al.  Undersampled-Based Modulation Schemes for Optical Camera Communications , 2018, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Liqiong Liu,et al.  47-kbit/s RGB-LED-based optical camera communication based on 2D-CNN and XOR-based data loss compensation. , 2019, Optics express.

[19]  Yeong Min Jang,et al.  Survey on optical camera communications: challenges and opportunities , 2015 .

[20]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  Optical camera communications: Survey, use cases, challenges, and future trends , 2018, Phys. Commun..

[21]  S. Zvánovec,et al.  Sandstorm effect on experimental optical camera communication. , 2020, Applied optics.

[22]  Ameet Talwalkar,et al.  Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization , 2016, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[23]  Chi-Wai Chow,et al.  Using logistic regression classification for mitigating high noise-ratio advisement light-panel in rolling-shutter based visible light communications. , 2019, Optics express.