Self-directed learning and guidance in non-formal open courses

Digital media and open educational resources (OER) are said to redraw the boundaries between learners and teachers, by weakening the centralization of expertise and the distribution of subject-matter authority. This paper presents the findings of an ethnographic study of how the use of OER mediates the relations between self-directed learners and facilitators in two online open courses offered at a non-formal educational organization. Findings highlight the different role played by OER in mediating the relations between learners and facilitators in the two courses. In one course, early-stage learners encountered difficulties in repurposing OER and needed help to move to a more advanced stage of conceptual understanding. In the other course, well-read participants used OER to develop an affinity space in which the facilitator was a fellow learner. The findings suggest that OER are better viewed as artifacts-in-interaction rather than resources to be delivered as they are to learners. Although facilitators at P2PU do not play the role of academic teachers, it is argued that the influence of OER on the facilitator role can have implications for that of the academic teachers as well.

[1]  Judith A. Ramaley,et al.  The Real Versus the Possible: Closing the Gaps in Engagement and Learning , 2005 .

[2]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[3]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[4]  G. Ferreira,et al.  Open educational resources and teaching in the 21st century: questions concerning authority , 2009 .

[5]  C. Hine Virtual Ethnography: Modes, Varieties, Affordances , 2008 .

[6]  J. Brown,et al.  Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 , 2008 .

[7]  David Wiley,et al.  Open for Learning: The CMS and the Open Learning Network , 2009 .

[8]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Online learning as information delivery: Digital myopia , 2004 .

[9]  Kathleen Cushman Minds on Fire. , 2014 .

[10]  C. Hmelo‐Silver Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[11]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[12]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[13]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[14]  V. Lektorsky,et al.  Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: Mediation as a Means of Collective Activity , 2009 .

[15]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[16]  Martin Weller Using learning environments as a metaphor for educational change , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew Lane,et al.  Widening Participation in Higher Education through Open Educational Resources , 2012 .

[18]  Toru Iiyoshi,et al.  Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge , 2008 .

[19]  Wai Fong Chua,et al.  The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing , 2001 .

[20]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2001 .