Use of assistive technology devices in mainstream schools: students' perspective.

OBJECTIVE The use and nonuse of assistive technology devices in school by students with physical disabilities was investigated, and the students' experiences in using these devices is described. METHOD We used a mixed-methods approach with predominantly qualitative methods to collect and analyze data, which included observations of and interviews with 20 students with physical disabilities and the number and type of assistive technology devices provided. RESULTS It is vital that devices be integrated into educational practice and that students experience immediate benefits for their function in everyday school activities without detrimental effects on their social participation. The latter was often more important than being able to perform activities independently. CONCLUSION The students adopted both a functional and a psychosocial perspective of their devices, and providers should neglect neither. Children and youth need both verbal information and practical experience using devices to be able to make informed decisions.

[1]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[2]  D. Caulley.  Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods , 2007 .

[3]  H. Hemmingsson,et al.  Students with disabilities participating in mainstream schools: policies that promote and limit teacher and therapist cooperation , 2007 .

[4]  Michael Curtin,et al.  Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies : Guidelines for occupational therapists. , 2007 .

[5]  M. Woolverton,et al.  Training needs of pediatric occupational therapists in assistive technology. , 2007, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  Wendy Seymour,et al.  ICTs and disability: Exploring the human dimensions of technological engagement , 2006 .

[7]  Gerald Craddock.  The AT continuum in education: Novice to power user , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[8]  Y. Gillette.  Assistive Technology and Literacy Partnerships , 2006 .

[9]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Living in the state of stuck : how assistive technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities , 2005 .

[10]  J. Ziviani,et al.  Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. , 2004, Occupational therapy international.

[11]  L. Miller,et al.  Assistive Technology and Handwriting Problems: What do Occupational Therapists Recommend? , 2004, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[12]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[13]  G. Gelderblom,et al.  Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview , 2004 .

[14]  James A Lenker,et al.  A Review of Conceptual Models for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research and Practice , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[15]  Incorporating or Resisting Assistive Devices: Different Approaches to Achieving a Desired Occupational Self-Image , 2003 .

[16]  S. Lane,et al.  Assistive Technology for Children with Disabilities , 2003, Occupational therapy in health care.

[17]  M. Scherer,et al.  Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process , 2002 .

[18]  Lisa Skär,et al.  Disabled children's perceptions of technical aids, assistance and peers in play situations. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[19]  C. Curtin,et al.  Eliciting children's voices in qualitative research. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[20]  R. Smith.  Research over the next century: impact of technology. , 2001, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[21]  M. Harris,et al.  Measuring knowledge of school-based occupational therapy. , 2000, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[22]  Lisa Skär,et al.  How children with restricted mobility perceive their technical aids , 2000 .

[23]  C. Hocking.  Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices ∗ , 1999 .

[24]  John M. Davis.  Understanding the meanings of children: a reflexive process , 1998 .

[25]  M. Law.  Client centered occupational therapy , 1998 .

[26]  R. Bogdan.  Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[27]  M. Wehmeyer.  Self-Determination as an Educational Outcome: A Definitional Framework and Implications for Intervention , 1997 .

[28]  T. Sumsion.  Book Review: Enabling Occupation: An Occupational Therapy Perspective , 1997 .

[29]  Dawn Leger,et al.  Assistive Technology: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1997 .

[30]  C. Unsworth,et al.  Occupational therapists' skills and attitudes regarding use of computers and assistive technology , 1997 .

[31]  S B Scott,et al.  Comparison of service delivery models influencing teachers' use of assistive technology for students with severe disabilities. , 1997, Occupational therapy in health care.

[32]  Herbert J. Rieth,et al.  A Survey of Assistive Technology Applications in Schools and Recommendations for Practice , 1996 .

[33]  Doris M. Carey,et al.  Practical Considerations in the Use of Technology to Facilitate the Inclusion of Students with Severe Disabilities , 1994 .

[34]  Bonnie Todis,et al.  User Perspectives on Assistive Technology in Educational Settings. , 1993 .

[35]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[36]  M. Koivikko,et al.  A regional survey of technical aids used by handicapped children in day care and at school. , 1992, Disability and rehabilitation.

[37]  L. Krefting.  Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[38]  Jane Case-Smith,et al.  Occupational Therapy for Children , 1988 .

[39]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .