A Method for Assessing Spectral Image Utility

The utility of an image is an attribute that describes the ability of that image to satisfy performance requirements for a particular application. This paper establishes the context for spectral image utility by first reviewing traditional approaches to assessing panchromatic image utility and then discussing differences for spectral imagery. We define spectral image utility for the subpixel target detection application as the area under the receiver operating curve summarized across a range of target detection scenario parameters. We propose a new approach to assessing the utility of any spectral image for any target type and size and detection algorithm. Using six airborne hyperspectral images, we demonstrate the sensitivity of the assessed image utility to various target detection scenario parameters and show the flexibility of this approach as a tool to answer specific user information requirements. The results of this investigation lead to a better understanding of spectral image information vis-a-vis target detection performance and provide a step toward quantifying the ability of a spectral image to satisfy information exploitation requirements.

[1]  James Theiler,et al.  Effect of signal contamination in matched-filter detection of the signal on a cluttered background , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[2]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Taxonomy of detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2005 .

[3]  Peter Bajorski,et al.  Analytical Comparison of the Matched Filter and Orthogonal Subspace Projection Detectors for Hyperspectral Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  T. Stein International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium , 1992, [Proceedings] IGARSS '92 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[5]  John M. Irvine,et al.  National imagery interpretability rating scales (NIIRS): overview and methodology , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[6]  Marcus S. Stefanou,et al.  Spectral image utility for target detection applications , 2008 .

[7]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  The CFAR adaptive subspace detector is a scale-invariant GLRT , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  Stanley R. Rotman,et al.  Algorithms for point target detection in hyperspectral imagery , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[9]  W. Farrand Mapping the distribution of mine tailings in the Coeur d'Alene River Valley, Idaho, through the use of a constrained energy minimization technique , 1997 .

[10]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Michael Kelley,et al.  National imagery interpretation rating system and the probabilities of detection, recognition, and identification , 1997 .

[12]  D. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications: a signal processing perspective , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[13]  Dimitris G. Manolakis,et al.  Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[14]  Gary A. Shaw,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Processing for Automatic Target Detection Applications , 2003 .

[15]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Spectral imaging system analytical model for subpixel object detection , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  John P. Kerekes,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Confidence Intervals and Regions , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Ronald G. Driggers,et al.  Surveillance and Reconnaissance Imaging Systems: Modeling and Performance Prediction , 2001 .

[18]  Louis L. Scharf,et al.  Adaptive subspace detectors , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..