Financial allocation strategy for the regional pollution abatement cost of reducing sulfur dioxide emissions in the thermal power sector in China

This study explores empirical evidence for two hypotheses through a macro productivity analysis using the nonparametric directional distance function approach applied to the thermal power sector. The first hypothesis is that the marginal abatement cost has significantly declined in recent years mainly due to domestic flue gas desulfurization technology in China, which has become available at a reasonable cost. The second is the existence of a certain budget scale, which, with policy intervention, would have significant outcomes. These hypotheses are successfully addressed through the findings that the marginal abatement cost in 2006 had declined by half since 2003 and that the strategic allocation of 10 billion yuan for SO2 emissions abatement would result in an additional 550,000 tonnes of SO2 reductions.

[1]  David G. Streets,et al.  Long-range transport of acidifying substances in East Asia—Part II. Source-receptor relationships , 2008 .

[2]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Measuring environmental efficiency of industry: a case study of thermal power generation in India , 2007 .

[3]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  Estimation of the shadow prices of pollutants with production/environment inefficiency taken into account: a nonparametric directional distance function approach. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[5]  Atakelty Hailu,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Analysis of the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry, 1959-1994: An Input Distance Function Approach , 2000 .

[6]  Gale A. Boyd,et al.  Alternative methods of marginal abatement cost estimation: Non- parametric distance functions , 1996 .

[7]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[8]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[9]  Gale A. Boyd,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants , 1999 .

[10]  William L. Weber,et al.  Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry? , 2004 .

[11]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries , 2001 .

[12]  Di Jin,et al.  Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: Rethinking the Porter Hypothesis , 2002 .

[13]  Shinji Kaneko,et al.  Coverage and reliability of Chinese statistics regarding sulfur dioxide emissions during the late 1990s , 2006 .

[14]  G. Boyd,et al.  Plant Level Productivity, Efficiency, and Environmental Performance of the Container Glass Industry , 2002 .

[15]  Isabelle Piot-Lepetit,et al.  Productivity and environmental regulation: the effect of the nitrates directive in the French pig sector , 2007 .

[16]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Distinguishing Weak and Strong Disposability among Undesirable Outputs in DEA: The Example of the Environmental Efficiency of Chinese Coal-Fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[17]  Katsuya Tanaka,et al.  Efficiency analysis of Chinese industry : A directional distance function approach , 2007 .

[18]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[19]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity and Undesirable Outputs: A Directional Distance Function Approach , 1995 .