Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system

The development of the COMPASS satellite system is introduced, and the regional tracking network and data availability are described. The precise orbit determination strategy of COMPASS satellites is presented. Data of June 2012 are processed. The obtained orbits are evaluated by analysis of post-fit residuals, orbit overlap comparison and SLR (satellite laser ranging) validation. The RMS (root mean square) values of post-fit residuals for one month’s data are smaller than 2.0 cm for ionosphere-free phase measurements and 2.6 m for ionosphere-free code observations. The 48-h orbit overlap comparison shows that the RMS values of differences in the radial component are much smaller than 10 cm and those of the cross-track component are smaller than 20 cm. The SLR validation shows that the overall RMS of observed minus computed residuals is 68.5 cm for G01 and 10.8 cm for I03. The static and kinematic PPP solutions are produced to further evaluate the accuracy of COMPASS orbit and clock products. The static daily COMPASS PPP solutions achieve an accuracy of better than 1 cm in horizontal and 3 cm in vertical. The accuracy of the COMPASS kinematic PPP solutions is within 1–2 cm in the horizontal and 4–7 cm in the vertical. In addition, we find that the COMPASS kinematic solutions are generally better than the GPS ones for the selected location. Furthermore, the COMPASS/GPS combinations significantly improve the accuracy of GPS only PPP solutions. The RMS values are basically smaller than 1 cm in the horizontal components and 3–4 cm in the vertical component.

[1]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  An Automatic Editing Algorithm for GPS data , 1990 .

[2]  W. I. Bertiger,et al.  Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase , 1992 .

[3]  G. Beutler,et al.  A New Solar Radiation Pressure Model for GPS Satellites , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[4]  Michael R Pearlman,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL LASER RANGING SERVICE , 2007 .

[5]  Jean-Luc Issler,et al.  Compass Signal Structure and First Measurements , 2007 .

[6]  Liu Jing-nan,et al.  PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination , 2003, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[7]  Jingnan Liu,et al.  Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing , 2008, International Conference on Earth Observation for Global Changes.

[8]  Jan Kouba,et al.  A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites , 2009 .

[9]  Todd Walter,et al.  Compass-M1 Broadcast Codes in E2, E5b, and E6 Frequency Bands , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[10]  Zhang Shao-cheng,et al.  An Analysis of Satellite Visibility and Relative Positioning Precision of COMPASS , 2010 .

[11]  F. N. Teferle,et al.  Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison , 2010 .

[12]  R. Fang,et al.  Seismic deformation of the Mw 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake from high-rate GPS observations , 2010 .

[13]  Rainer Wansch,et al.  Multi-Band GNSS Antenna , 2011 .

[14]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Precise orbit determination of GIOVE-B based on the CONGO network , 2011 .

[15]  Jing Guo,et al.  GRACE gravity field modeling with an investigation on correlation between nuisance parameters and gravity field coefficients , 2011 .

[16]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  Characterization of Compass M-1 signals , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[17]  Maorong Ge,et al.  What is Achievable with Current COMPASS Constellations , 2012 .

[18]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Initial assessment of the COMPASS/BeiDou-2 regional navigation satellite system , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[19]  Zhigang Hu,et al.  Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites , 2012, GPS Solutions.

[20]  Initial Observations and analysis of Compass meO Satellite Signals , .