A quantitative understanding of lac repressor’s binding specificity and flexibility

[1]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Increased subtlety of transcription factor binding increases complexity of genome regulation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Zheng Zuo,et al.  High-Resolution Specificity from DNA Sequencing Highlights Alternative Modes of Lac Repressor Binding , 2014, Genetics.

[3]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  Modeling the specificity of protein-DNA interactions , 2013, Quantitative Biology.

[4]  Axel Cournac,et al.  DNA Looping in Prokaryotes: Experimental and Theoretical Approaches , 2013, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Julio Collado-Vides,et al.  RegulonDB version 7.0: transcriptional regulation of Escherichia coli K-12 integrated within genetic sensory response units (Gensor Units) , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[6]  Robert Daber,et al.  Functional rules for lac repressor–operator associations and implications for protein–DNA interactions , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  Inna Dubchak,et al.  RegPrecise: a database of curated genomic inferences of transcriptional regulatory interactions in prokaryotes , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  M. Lewis,et al.  Towards evolving a better repressor. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[9]  R. Kaptein,et al.  Specificity and affinity of Lac repressor for the auxiliary operators O2 and O3 are explained by the structures of their protein-DNA complexes. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[11]  M. Lewis,et al.  The lac repressor. , 2005, Comptes rendus biologies.

[12]  Rolf Boelens,et al.  Toward an integrated model of protein-DNA recognition as inferred from NMR studies on the Lac repressor system. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[13]  P. V. von Hippel Completing the View of Transcriptional Regulation , 2004, Science.

[14]  P. V. Hippel,et al.  Completing the View of Transcriptional Regulation , 2004 .

[15]  G. Stormo,et al.  Additivity in protein-DNA interactions: how good an approximation is it? , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  D. Hart,et al.  The salt dependence of DNA recognition by NF-kappaB p50: a detailed kinetic analysis of the effects on affinityand specificity. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  S. Melcher,et al.  Thermodynamics of the interactions of lac repressor with variants of the symmetric lac operator: effects of converting a consensus site to a non-specific site. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  G. Chang,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Lactose Operon Repressor and Its Complexes with DNA and Inducer , 1996, Science.

[19]  M. Schumacher,et al.  Crystal structure of LacI member, PurR, bound to DNA: minor groove binding by alpha helices. , 1994, Science.

[20]  M C Mossing,et al.  Thermodynamic origins of specificity in the lac repressor-operator interaction. Adaptability in the recognition of mutant operator sites. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  P. Dehaseth,et al.  Interpretation of monovalent and divalent cation effects on the lac repressor-operator interaction. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[22]  W. Gilbert,et al.  The nucleotide sequence of the lac operator. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Riggs,et al.  Lac repressor-operator interaction. I. Equilibrium studies. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. Monod,et al.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. , 1961, Journal of molecular biology.