Using mixture models with known class membership to address incomplete covariance structures in multiple-group growth models.

Multi-group latent growth modelling in the structural equation modelling framework has been widely utilized for examining differences in growth trajectories across multiple manifest groups. Despite its usefulness, the traditional maximum likelihood estimation for multi-group latent growth modelling is not feasible when one of the groups has no response at any given data collection point, or when all participants within a group have the same response at one of the time points. In other words, multi-group latent growth modelling requires a complete covariance structure for each observed group. The primary purpose of the present study is to show how to circumvent these data problems by developing a simple but creative approach using an existing estimation procedure for growth mixture modelling. A Monte Carlo simulation study was carried out to see whether the modified estimation approach provided tangible results and to see how these results were comparable to the standard multi-group results. The proposed approach produced results that were valid and reliable under the mentioned problematic data conditions. We also present a real data example and demonstrate that the proposed estimation approach can be used for the chi-square difference test to check various types of measurement invariance as conducted in a standard multi-group analysis.

[1]  D. Kaplan Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[2]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[3]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological Momentary Assessment (Ema) in Behavioral Medicine , 1994 .

[4]  B. Muthén,et al.  Finite Mixture Modeling with Mixture Outcomes Using the EM Algorithm , 1999, Biometrics.

[5]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Multiple-group structural modelling with non-normal continuous variables. , 1989 .

[6]  R. Rumberger Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods: and. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992. (ISBN 0-8039-4627-9), pp. xvi + 265. Price: U.S. $45.00 (cloth) , 1997 .

[7]  Bengt,et al.  Latent Variable Analysis With Categorical Outcomes : Multiple-Group And Growth Modeling In Mplus , 2002 .

[8]  David A Cole,et al.  Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: introducing a trait-state-occasion model. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[9]  Megan E. Piper,et al.  A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of 5 smoking cessation pharmacotherapies. , 2009, Archives of general psychiatry.

[10]  Albert Satorra,et al.  Scaled and Adjusted Restricted Tests in Multi Sample Analysis of Moment Structures , 1999 .

[11]  B. Muthén,et al.  How to Use a Monte Carlo Study to Decide on Sample Size and Determine Power , 2002 .

[12]  Albert Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[13]  H. Fitzgerald,et al.  Temperamental characteristics as predictors of externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems in the contexts of high and low parental psychopathology , 2001 .

[14]  K. Jöreskog A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System. , 1970 .

[15]  D. Farrington,et al.  Violence and Serious Theft : Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood , 2008 .

[16]  H. Siegal,et al.  Evaluation of Hiv Risk Reduction Intervention Programs Via Latent Growth Model , 1999, Evaluation review.

[17]  Gerhard Arminger,et al.  Finite Mixtures of Covariance Structure Models with Regressors , 1997 .

[18]  K. Jöreskog Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations , 1971 .

[19]  A. Thapar,et al.  Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families , 1993 .

[20]  B. Muthén Latent Variable Mixture Modeling , 2001 .

[21]  B. Muthén BEYOND SEM: GENERAL LATENT VARIABLE MODELING , 2002 .

[22]  C. Hendricks Brown,et al.  Power Calculations for Data Missing by Design: Applications to a Follow-Up Study of Lead Exposure and Attention , 2000 .

[23]  A. Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[24]  Jürgen Baumert,et al.  Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. , 2000 .

[25]  David Kaplan,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.): Foundations and Extensions , 2009 .

[26]  Megan E. Piper,et al.  Tobacco withdrawal components and their relations with cessation success , 2011, Psychopharmacology.

[27]  Amy S. Weitlauf,et al.  Disentangling the prospective relations between maladaptive cognitions and depressive symptoms. , 2011, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  Gregory J. Palardy Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: a multiple group, multilevel latent growth curve analysis , 2008 .

[29]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class–latent growth modeling. , 2001 .

[30]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs. , 1996 .

[31]  Megan E. Piper,et al.  Why two smoking cessation agents work better than one: role of craving suppression. , 2012, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[32]  J. Mcardle,et al.  Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models , 1986, Behavior genetics.

[33]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[34]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[35]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .

[36]  J. Baumert,et al.  Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data , 2022 .

[37]  K. G. J8reskoC,et al.  Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations , 2007 .

[38]  P. Deb Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .

[39]  D. Sörbom A GENERAL METHOD FOR STUDYING DIFFERENCES IN FACTOR MEANS AND FACTOR STRUCTURE BETWEEN GROUPS , 1974 .

[40]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[41]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Latent Variable Analysis: Growth Mixture Modeling and Related Techniques for Longitudinal Data , 2004 .

[42]  William Meredith,et al.  Latent curve analysis , 1990 .

[43]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[44]  R. Loeber,et al.  Developmental Patterns of Alcohol Use in Relation to Persistence and Desistance of Serious Violent Offending among African American and Caucasian Young Men. , 2012, Criminology : an interdisciplinary journal.

[45]  D P MacKinnon,et al.  Maximizing the Usefulness of Data Obtained with Planned Missing Value Patterns: An Application of Maximum Likelihood Procedures. , 1996, Multivariate behavioral research.

[46]  Su-Young Kim,et al.  Sample Size Requirements in Single- and Multiphase Growth Mixture Models: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 2012 .

[47]  Stephen J Tueller,et al.  Evaluation of Structural Equation Mixture Models: Parameter Estimates and Correct Class Assignment , 2010, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.