Simulation and Flight Evaluation of a Parameter Estimation Input Design Method for Hybrid-Wing-Body Aircraft

As part of an effort to improve emissions, noise, and performance of next generation aircraft, it is expected that future aircraft will make use of distributed, multi-objective control effectors in a closed-loop flight control system. Correlation challenges associated with parameter estimation will arise with this expected aircraft configuration. Research presented in this paper focuses on addressing the correlation problem with an appropriate input design technique and validating this technique through simulation and flight test of the X-48B aircraft. The X-48B aircraft is an 8.5 percent-scale hybrid wing body aircraft demonstrator designed by The Boeing Company (Chicago, Illinois, USA), built by Cranfield Aerospace Limited (Cranfield, Bedford, United Kingdom) and flight tested at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Dryden Flight Research Center (Edwards, California, USA). Based on data from flight test maneuvers performed at Dryden Flight Research Center, aerodynamic parameter estimation was performed using linear regression and output error techniques. An input design technique that uses temporal separation for de-correlation of control surfaces is proposed, and simulation and flight test results are compared with the aerodynamic database. This paper will present a method to determine individual control surface aerodynamic derivatives.

[1]  Christopher D. Regan,et al.  X-48B Flight Research - Test Progress and Instrumentation Needs for the Future , 2009 .

[2]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Real-Time Stability and Control Derivative Extraction From F-15 Flight Data , 2003 .

[3]  A Morelli Eugene Flight Test Validation of Optimal Input Design and Comparison to Conventional Inputs , 1997 .

[4]  Eugene A. Morelli Multiple input design for real-time parameter estimation in the frequency domain , 2003 .

[5]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Flight-Test Experiment Design for Characterizing Stability and Control of Hypersonic Vehicles , 2009 .

[6]  R. E. Maine,et al.  Identification of dynamic systems, theory and formulation , 1985 .

[7]  D. Walberg,et al.  From Flight. Data , 1980 .

[8]  Eugene A. Morelli Practical input optimization for aircraft parameter estimation experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, 1990 , 1993 .

[9]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Optimal Input Design for Aircraft Parameter Estimation using Dynamic Programming Principles , 1990 .

[10]  R. V. Jategaonkar,et al.  Aircraft system identification , 2006 .

[11]  K. W. Iliff,et al.  Effects of time-shifted data on flight determined stability and control derivatives , 1975 .

[12]  R. E. Maine,et al.  Application of parameter estimation to aircraft stability and control: The output-error approach , 1986 .

[13]  R. E. Maine,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Estimating the Accuracy of Dynamic Flight-Determined Coefficients , 1981 .

[14]  R. E. Maine,et al.  Important factors in the maximum likelihood analysis of flight test maneuvers , 1979 .

[15]  B. M. Trujillo Determination of lift and drag characteristics of Space Shuttle Orbiter using maximum likelihood estimation technique , 1986 .

[16]  Eugene A. Morelli,et al.  Aircraft system identification : theory and practice , 2006 .

[17]  E A Morelli F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle (HARV) Parameter Identification Flight Test Maneuvers for Optimal Input Design Validation and Lateral Control Effectiveness , 1995 .

[18]  Elder M. Hemerly,et al.  Aircraft Parameter Estimation Experiment Design Considering Measurement Colored Residuals , 2006 .