Noise-Resilient Blind Deconvolution using Error-Correcting Codes

Future communication systems pose stringent requirements on communication latency between two nodes. One way to reduce the latency is by reducing control plane overhead by estimating the channel without training symbols. The combined process of estimating the channel and equalizing is called blind deconvolution. In this paper, our contribution is two-fold. First, we concatenate random coding (blind deconvolution using convex programming) solver with error-correcting code (ECC) decoder. Second, we propose an intelligent perturbation algorithm (IPA) that uses the ECC decoder to assist the random coding solver iteratively in solving the blind deconvolution problem. We also define the theoretical bounds for the optimal rate of the generator matrix of ECC. We have performed error-rate simulations for both Gaussian as well as Rayleigh channels. IPA provides 5 dB gain in terms of $E_{b}/N_{0}$ over the system that uses random coding solver alone and 1 dB gain over the serial concatenation of the random coding solver and the ECC decoder, for a message length of 30 to achieve 10−3 frame-error rate. IPA also provides 4 dB gain to achieve 10−3 frame-error rate over the random coding solver alone, for a message length of 128.

[1]  Karim G. Sabra,et al.  Multichannel blind deconvolution using low rank recovery , 2013, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[2]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  A convex approach to blind deconvolution with diverse inputs , 2015, 2015 IEEE 6th International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP).

[3]  Martin Bossert,et al.  Channel Coding for Telecommunications , 1999 .

[4]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  Constrained blind deconvolution using Wirtinger flow methods , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA).

[5]  M. Salman Asif,et al.  Random channel coding and blind deconvolution , 2009, 2009 47th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[6]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Convex Programming , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  Rapid, Robust, and Reliable Blind Deconvolution via Nonconvex Optimization , 2016, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis.

[8]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  Short-message communication and FIR system identification using Huffman sequences , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[9]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Lifting for Blind Deconvolution in Random Mask Imaging: Identifiability and Convex Relaxation , 2015, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[10]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Ultrareliable and Low-Latency Wireless Communication: Tail, Risk, and Scale , 2018, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  How to Escape Saddle Points Efficiently , 2017, ICML.

[12]  Md. Mizanur Rahman,et al.  Effect of AWGN & Fading (Raleigh & Rician) channels on BER performance of a WiMAX communication System , 2012, ArXiv.