Evaluation of clinical performance of twelve posterior composite resins with a standardized placement technique.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate 12 posterior composite resins with a standard clinical placement technique that could be followed in a practice setting. Important points stressed are the use of rubber dam, care taken to detail on manufacturer's directions, incremental placement technique, and a standard finishing technique. Sixty-one Class II restorations were placed by a single operator. All of the restorations were evaluated at baseline, one and three years using the modified Ryge criteria. Indirect evaluation of wear was completed for each restoration using Leinfelder's technique. Two percent of the restorations at 1 year and 17 percent at 3 years were not clinically acceptable.

[1]  Equipment,et al.  Obstacles to the development of a standard for posterior composite resins. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. , 1989, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[2]  Goldstein Re,et al.  Finishing of composites and laminates. , 1989 .

[3]  M. Suzuki,et al.  Light-cured glass ionomers. , 1989, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[4]  K. Leinfelder Posterior composite resins. , 1988, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[5]  T. Lundeen,et al.  Five-year study of two light-cured posterior composite resins. , 1988, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  M. Suzuki,et al.  A visible light-cured posterior composite resin: results of a 3-year clinical evaluation. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  A. Gwinnett,et al.  Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. , 1986, Operative dentistry.

[8]  Alan D. Wilson,et al.  The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine , 1985, British Dental Journal.

[9]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  Clinical Evaluation Methods for Posterior Composite Restorations , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[10]  F Lutz,et al.  In vivo and in vitro Wear of Potential Posterior Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[11]  D. Beech,et al.  An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements. , 1982, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  McLean Jw Status report on the glass ionomer cements. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. , 1979 .

[13]  R. Jordan,et al.  Pulpal response to composite-resin materials. , 1972, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.