Thermal characterization of buildings from the monitoring of the AC system consumption

Abstract This work presents a comparative study between two buildings or cubicles with a same geometry and orientation but with different constructive layers. The mineral wool cubicle is more insulated whereas the alveolar cubicle has more thermal inertia. A novel point in this study has been to evaluate indirectly the thermal load based on the energy consumption of the heat pumps. The results indicate that the mineral wool cubicle consumes up to 7.3% less energy consumption than the alveolar cubicle, particularly in summer. In fact, the load in summer is up to 11.6% higher with the alveolar cubicle, which gains more solar energy during daytime due to its inertia. The power consumption is practically aligned with the outdoor temperatures since it is very sensitive to the operating temperatures. Nevertheless, the peak building load can take place up to 5 h later than the peak outdoor temperature, particularly in summer and in the alveolar cubicle. Finally, the proposed approach has helped obtained in situ U -values of 0.20–0.27 W m −2  K −1 for both cubicles.

[1]  Sten de Wit,et al.  Uncertainty in building simulation , 2004 .

[2]  William W. Clark,et al.  Configuring wall layers for improved insulation performance , 2013 .

[3]  Francesco Patania,et al.  Assessment of the dynamic thermal performance of massive buildings , 2014 .

[4]  Massimiliano Scarpa,et al.  On-field validation of a seasonal performance calculation method for chillers in buildings , 2014 .

[5]  Pier Giorgio Cesaratto,et al.  A measuring campaign of thermal conductance in situ and possible impacts on net energy demand in buildings , 2013 .

[6]  Caterina Di Perna,et al.  Influence of the internal inertia of the building envelope on summertime comfort in buildings with h , 2011 .

[7]  R. Newman.  Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources , 2014 .

[8]  R. Nordman.  IEA Technology Roadmap - Energy-efficient Buildings : Heating and Cooling Equipment , 2011 .

[9]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[10]  Niccolò Aste,et al.  The influence of the external walls thermal inertia on the energy performance of well insulated buildings , 2009 .

[11]  Vincent Sambou,et al.  Thermal optimization of multilayered walls using genetic algorithms , 2009 .

[12]  Paolo Maria Congedo,et al.  Assessment of cost-optimality and technical solutions in high performance multi-residential buildings in the Mediterranean area , 2015 .

[13]  J. B. Siviour,et al.  Experimental U-values of some house walls , 1994 .

[14]  Paolo Maria Congedo,et al.  Design method of high performance precast external walls for warm climate by multi-objective optimization analysis , 2015 .

[15]  John Gelegenis,et al.  Optimum insulation thickness for external walls on different orientations considering the speed and direction of the wind , 2014 .

[16]  Anthony J. Robinson,et al.  Transient and quasi-steady thermal behaviour of a building envelope due to retrofitted cavity wall and ceiling insulation , 2013 .

[17]  Rita Mastrullo,et al.  Experimental analysis of the scroll compressor performances varying its speed , 2006 .

[18]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Dynamic thermal performance of alveolar brick construction system , 2011 .

[19]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Experimental study on the performance of insulation materials in Mediterranean construction , 2010 .

[20]  Brian Anderson,et al.  Uncertainty in the thermal conductivity of insulation materials , 2010 .

[21]  Domenico Laforgia,et al.  Multi-objective optimization analysis for high efficiency external walls of zero energy buildings (ZEB) in the Mediterranean climate , 2014 .