Multiparadigm Inquiry: Exploring Organizational Pluralism and Paradox

Organization studies is a robust field, replete with diverse, often contentious perspectives that may enrich understandings of pluralism and paradox. Yet polarization of modern paradigms and ruptures between modern and postmodern stances may inhibit researchers from tapping this potential. In response, this article delves into a provocative alternative - multiparadigm inquiry. First, we juxtapose modern, postmodern and multiparadigm approaches to contrast their underlying assumptions. We then review three multiparadigm strategies, exploring their objectives, exemplars and limitations. Our conclusion addresses how multiparadigm inquiry fosters greater reflexivity, while posing considerable challenges.

[1]  Culture Formation in a New Television Station: A Multi-perspective Analysis , 2000 .

[2]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms , 1999 .

[3]  L. Smircich,et al.  Past Postmodernism? Reflections and Tentative Directions , 1999 .

[4]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s , 1999 .

[5]  M van Gils,et al.  Organizational analysis as deconstructive practice , 1999 .

[6]  J. Spender.  Pluralist Epistemology and the Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm , 1998 .

[7]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  The Myth of Paradigm Incommensurability in Management Studies: Comments by an Integrationist , 1998 .

[8]  Hamid Bouchikhi,et al.  Living with and Building on Complexity: A Constructivist Perspective on Organizations , 1998 .

[9]  Andreas Georg Scherer,et al.  Pluralism and Incommensurability in Strategic Management and Organization Theory: A Problem in Search of a Solution , 1998 .

[10]  Douglas G. Birdsall.  Handbook of organization studies , 1998 .

[11]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Handbook of organization studies , 1997 .

[12]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  Postmodernism and Organizational Research , 1997 .

[13]  David Knights,et al.  Organization Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited , 1997 .

[14]  M. Reed,et al.  In Praise of Duality and Dualism: Rethinking Agency and Structure in Organizational Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  Objectivity and Its Other , 1996 .

[16]  M. Hatch,et al.  Living With Multiple Paradigms the Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies , 1996 .

[17]  S. Deetz.  Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy , 1996 .

[18]  'The Duck-billed Platypus in the Theory and Analysis of Organizations: Combinations of Consensus and Dissensus' , 1996 .

[19]  C.T.J. Hogema.  'Global Identity-Local Oddity? Paradoxical Processes In Contemporary Organisations' , 1996 .

[20]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia.  From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis , 1995 .

[21]  Martin Parker,et al.  Critique in the Name of What? Postmodernism and Critical Approaches to Organization , 1995 .

[22]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Paradigms Lost: Incommensurability vs Structurationist Inquiry , 1994 .

[23]  John Hassard,et al.  POSTMODERN ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS: TOWARD A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 1994 .

[24]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  PFEFFER'S Barriers to The Advance Of Organizational Science: A Rejoinder , 1994 .

[25]  D. Mumby.  Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives , 1994 .

[26]  D. Mccloskey.  Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics , 1994 .

[27]  John Hassard,et al.  Postmodernism and organization , 1993 .

[28]  V. Murray,et al.  Illusions and Other Games: A Trifocal View of Organizational Politics , 1991 .

[29]  Martin Parker,et al.  Five Texts in Search of an Author: A Response to John Hassard's 'Multiple Paradigms and Organizational Analysis' , 1991 .

[30]  Pauline Marie Rosenau,et al.  Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions , 1991 .

[31]  Norman Jackson,et al.  In Defence of Paradigm Incommensurability , 1991 .

[32]  K. Grint.  The sociology of work : an introduction , 1991 .

[33]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building , 1990 .

[34]  E. Guba,et al.  The Paradigm dialog , 1990 .

[35]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories , 1989 .

[36]  G. Burrell,et al.  Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Introduction , 1988 .

[37]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[38]  M. Reed.  Redirections in Organizational Analysis , 1985 .

[39]  J. Hassard.  Multiple paradigms and organisational research: an analysis of work behaviour in the fire service , 1985 .

[40]  James T. Tedeschi,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organizations , 1984 .

[41]  L. Smircich.  Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[42]  Complex organizations : critical perspectives , 1982 .

[43]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[44]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[45]  Graham Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[46]  A. Gouldner,et al.  The Coming Crisis in Western Sociology , 1971 .

[47]  J. Derrida.  Writing and Difference , 1967 .

[48]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[49]  A. Whitehead.  Science and the Modern World , 1926 .