A Proof-of-Concept for Semantically Interoperable Federation of IoT Experimentation Facilities

The Internet-of-Things (IoT) is unanimously identified as one of the main pillars of future smart scenarios. The potential of IoT technologies and deployments has been already demonstrated in a number of different application areas, including transport, energy, safety and healthcare. However, despite the growing number of IoT deployments, the majority of IoT applications tend to be self-contained, thereby forming application silos. A lightweight data centric integration and combination of these silos presents several challenges that still need to be addressed. Indeed, the ability to combine and synthesize data streams and services from diverse IoT platforms and testbeds, holds the promise to increase the potentiality of smart applications in terms of size, scope and targeted business context. In this article, a proof-of-concept implementation that federates two different IoT experimentation facilities by means of semantic-based technologies will be described. The specification and design of the implemented system and information models will be described together with the practical details of the developments carried out and its integration with the existing IoT platforms supporting the aforementioned testbeds. Overall, the system described in this paper demonstrates that it is possible to open new horizons in the development of IoT applications and experiments at a global scale, that transcend the (silo) boundaries of individual deployments, based on the semantic interconnection and interoperability of diverse IoT platforms and testbeds.

[1]  Francesco Sottile,et al.  IERC Activity Chain 2 DELIVERABLE D 1 “ Catalogue of IoT Naming , Addressing and Discovery Schemes in IERC Projects ” , 2022 .

[2]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  Managing Large Amounts of Data Generated by a Smart City Internet of Things Deployment , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[3]  Martin Bauer,et al.  Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems pp. 949–955 ISBN 978-83-60810-22-4 Service Modelling for the Internet of Things , 2022 .

[4]  J. Manyika,et al.  Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy , 2013 .

[5]  Kay Römer,et al.  SPITFIRE: toward a semantic web of things , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Martin Hepp,et al.  GoodRelations: An Ontology for Describing Products and Services Offers on the Web , 2008, EKAW.

[7]  Michael Koch,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing , 2001, CSCW-Kompendium.

[8]  Mahdi Ben Alaya,et al.  Toward semantic interoperability in oneM2M architecture , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  M. Weiser,et al.  Hot topics-ubiquitous computing , 1993 .

[10]  M. Shamim Hossain,et al.  A Survey on Sensor-Cloud: Architecture, Applications, and Approaches , 2013, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[11]  Luis Muñoz,et al.  Large-Scale Mobile Sensing Enabled Internet-of-Things Testbed for Smart City Services , 2015, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[12]  Alexander Gluhak,et al.  SmartCampus: A user-centric testbed for Internet of Things experimentation , 2013, 2013 16th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).

[13]  Florian Schreiner,et al.  Architecture for the heterogeneous federation of Future Internet experimentation facilities , 2013, 2013 Future Network & Mobile Summit.

[14]  Thomas Magedanz,et al.  Towards Semantic Monitoring Data Collection and Representation in Federated Infrastructures , 2015, 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud.

[15]  Maximilian Ott,et al.  OMF: a control and management framework for networking testbeds , 2010, OPSR.

[16]  Ingrid Moerman,et al.  Integration of Heterogeneous Devices and Communication Models via the Cloud in the Constrained Internet of Things , 2015, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[17]  Armin Haller,et al.  Semantic Sensor Network Ontology , 2017 .

[18]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[19]  Christos V. Verikoukis,et al.  Protocols and Architectures for Next-Generation Wireless Sensor Networks , 2014, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[20]  Jason Stanley,et al.  Enabling Sensor Webs by Utilizing SWAMO for Autonomous Operations , 2008 .

[21]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[22]  Evangelos Theodoridis,et al.  SmartSantander: IoT experimentation over a smart city testbed , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[23]  Joerg Swetina,et al.  Toward a standardized common M2M service layer platform: Introduction to oneM2M , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications.