Monte Carlo simulation of the scatter contribution in a 3D whole-body PET

Scatter contamination is one of the main reasons for image degradation in 3D Positron Emission Tomography (PET). The knowledge about the amount of scatter and its distribution is a prerequisite for performing an accurate scatter correction. One concern is the scatter contribution from activity outside the field-of-view (FOV) and multiple scatter. We examined the scatter distribution for various phantoms using Monte Carlo simulations. The simulations were performed for a whole-body PET system (ECAT EXACT HR/sup +/, Siemens/CTI). The scanner has an axial FOV of 15.5 cm and a ring diameter of 82.7 cm. With (without) interplane septa the scatter contribution is up to 40(65)% (for a line source in a 40 cm cylinder) of the total counts. The scatter fraction varies significantly with the axial position. The results show also that for an accurate scatter correction, both activity and scatter media outside the FOV have to be taken into account. Furthermore it could be shown that there is a considerable amount of multiple scatter which has a different spatial distribution from single scatter. Therefore multiple scatter cannot be corrected by simply rescaling the single scatter component.

[1]  Michel Dubois,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the , 1995 .

[2]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Special Papers Section-NPSS/Medical Imaging Conference Cross-Plane Scattering Correction-Point Source Deconvolution in PET , 1991 .

[3]  John M. Ollinger.  The Effect of Energy Threshold on Image Variance in Fully 3D PET , 1996 .

[4]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Composite Dual Window Scattering Correction Technique In PET , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[5]  M E Bellemann,et al.  Monte Carlo-based analysis of PET scatter components. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  G Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  S. Grootoonk,et al.  Correction for scatter using a dual energy window technique with a tomograph operated without septa , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[8]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[9]  J Logan,et al.  A Monte Carlo Simulation of Compton Scattering in Positron Emission Tomography , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  S R Meikle,et al.  A convolution-subtraction scatter correction method for 3D PET. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  L.-E. Adam,et al.  Experimentelle Bestimmung der unteren Energieschwelle eines Positronen-Emissions-Tomographen , 1999 .

[12]  R. Trebossen,et al.  A PET scatter correction using simultaneous acquisitions with low and high lower energy thresholds , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[13]  G J Hademenos,et al.  Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  Triple energy window scatter correction technique in PET , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR + , 1997 .

[16]  Sibylle Ziegler,et al.  Scatter correction in the transaxial slices of a whole-body positron emission tomograph , 1993 .

[17]  Martin J. Lercher,et al.  Scatter correction in 3-D PET , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  J. G. Rogers,et al.  Object shape dependent scatter simulations for PET , 1991 .

[19]  E. Hoffman,et al.  A Monte Carlo correction for the effect of Compton scattering in 3-D PET brain imaging , 1995 .