The stability of covariance inflation methods for SLAM

This paper analyses the consequences of using Covariance Inflation Methods for Simultaneous Localisation and Map Building (SLAM). Covariance Inflation refers to the process of adding a positive semidefinite matrix to the system covariance matrix to improve the properties of a SLAM algorithm. Because this approach can be used to decorrelate the state estimates in the covariance matrix, it has the potential to greatly reduce both computational and storage costs. However, it also raises the risk that the covariance can increase without bound. This paper analyses the properties of covariance inflation algorithms to assess their impact on performance. We prove that, to prevent the steady-state covariance from being increased, the computational and storage costs must be linear in the number of beacons. Furthermore, if the steady-state covariance is to remain finite, the inflation method cannot impose structures on the filter which are continually broken down. These results are illustrated in a simple linear example.

[1]  Eduardo Mario Nebot,et al.  Optimization of the simultaneous localization and map-building algorithm for real-time implementation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  New approach to map building using relative position estimates , 1997, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[3]  Eduardo Mario Nebot,et al.  Solving computational and memory requirements of feature-based simultaneous localization and mapping algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  Randall Smith,et al.  Estimating Uncertain Spatial Relationships in Robotics , 1987, Autonomous Robot Vehicles.

[5]  Paul Newman,et al.  On the Structure and Solution of the Simultaneous Localisation and Map Building Problem , 1999 .

[6]  Andrew J. Davison,et al.  Mobile Robot Navigation Using Active Vision , 1998 .

[7]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  FastSLAM: a factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Günther Schmidt,et al.  Building a global map of the environment of a mobile robot: the importance of correlations , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  A counter example to the theory of simultaneous localization and map building , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[10]  Michael Bosse,et al.  An Atlas framework for scalable mapping , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).