Spatially restricted electrical activation of retinal ganglion cells in the rabbit retina by hexapolar electrode return configuration

OBJECTIVE Visual prostheses currently in development aim to restore some form of vision to patients suffering from diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. Most rely on electrically stimulating inner retinal cells via electrodes implanted on or near the retina, resulting in percepts of light termed 'phosphenes'. Activation of spatially distinct populations of cells in the retina is key for pattern vision to be produced. To achieve this, the electrical stimulation must be localized, activating cells only in the direct vicinity of the stimulating electrode(s). With this goal in mind, a hexagonal return (hexapolar) configuration has been proposed as an alternative to the traditional monopolar or bipolar return configurations for electrically stimulating the retina. This study investigated the efficacy of the hexapolar configuration in localizing the activation of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), compared to a monopolar configuration. APPROACH Patch-clamp electrophysiology was used to measure the activation thresholds of RGCs in whole-mount rabbit retina to monopolar and hexapolar electrical stimulation, applied subretinally. MAIN RESULTS Hexapolar activation thresholds for RGCs located outside the hex guard were found to be significantly (>2 fold) higher than those located inside the area of tissue bounded by the hex guard. The hexapolar configuration localized the activation of RGCs more effectively than its monopolar counterpart. Furthermore, no difference in hexapolar thresholds or localization was observed when using cathodic-first versus anodic-first stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE The hexapolar configuration may provide an improved method for electrically stimulating spatially distinct populations of cells in retinal tissue.

[1]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Spatial resolution and perception of patterns mediated by a subretinal 16-electrode array in patients blinded by hereditary retinal dystrophies. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  J. Weiland,et al.  Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina , 1999, Vision Research.

[4]  S. Kelly,et al.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  D Hickingbotham,et al.  Bipolar surface electrical stimulation of the vertebrate retina. , 1994, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  S. Fried,et al.  Axonal sodium-channel bands shape the response to electric stimulation in retinal ganglion cells. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A Hofman,et al.  Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. , 1998, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  R. Jensen,et al.  Responses of ganglion cells to repetitive electrical stimulation of the retina , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Philippe Renaud,et al.  Simulation of epiretinal prostheses - Evaluation of geometrical factors affecting stimulation thresholds , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  P. Preston,et al.  In-Vitro Testing of Simultaneous Charge Injection and Recovery in a Retinal Neuroprosthesis , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[13]  C A Curcio,et al.  Preservation of ganglion cell layer neurons in age-related macular degeneration. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  G. Suaning,et al.  A bidomain model of epiretinal stimulation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  N. Maccarthy,et al.  Monopolar vs. bipolar subretinal stimulation—An in vitro study , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[18]  Alfred Stett,et al.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells following epiretinal electrical stimulation with hexagonally arranged bipolar electrodes , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  David Tsai,et al.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with a subretinal electrode. , 2006, Experimental eye research.

[22]  G. Suaning,et al.  Finite Element Bidomain Model of Epiretinal Stimulation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  G. J. Suaning,et al.  Focal activation of the feline retina via a suprachoroidal electrode array , 2009, Vision Research.

[24]  William J Tyler,et al.  A quantitative overview of biophysical forces impinging on neural function , 2013, Physical biology.

[25]  Chris E. Williams,et al.  Visual cortex responses to suprachoroidal electrical stimulation of the retina: effects of electrode return configuration. , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  J. Rizzo,et al.  Multi-electrode stimulation and recording in the isolated retina , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  S. Dokos,et al.  Current Distribution During Parallel Stimulation: Implications for an Epiretinal Neuroprosthesis , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[28]  E. Chichilnisky,et al.  Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode arrays. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  J. L. Stone,et al.  Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[30]  T. Lehmann,et al.  Microelectronic Retinal Prosthesis: I. A Neurostimulator for the Concurrent Activation of Multiple Electrodes , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  H. Kishima,et al.  Testing of semichronically implanted retinal prosthesis by suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  A continuum model of retinal electrical stimulation , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.