Treatment performance of an aerated constructed wetland treating glycol from de-icing operations at a UK airport.

Abstract Mayfield Farm Treatment System receives effluent collected from the Southern Catchment of Heathrow Airport, a total of 290 ha. During winter operations, weather-related de-icing activity results in large shifts in the flow and concentrations of airport run-off. The biological treatment of spent de-icing fluids is challenging because it involves the treatment of a cold and nutrient-deficient wastewater of variable flow and strength. After a successful full scale trial to determine the efficacy of aerated wetlands, the entire treatment system was upgraded and optimized in 2010. It consisted of a primary reservoir, partial and complete mix zones, a balancing lagoon, and 12 aerated horizontal sub-surface flow (HSSF) treatment wetlands operating in parallel, with a total wetland area of 2.08 ha. The original non-aerated HSSF wetland system, commissioned in 2001 had a design cBOD5 loading rate of 374 kg/day at a flow rate of 40 l/s ( Revitt et al., 2001 , Richter et al., 2003 ). The aerated HSSF wetlands now have a design cBOD5 loading rate of 2073 kg/day at a maximum flow rate of 80 l/s. Due to the weather conditions of the UK, the system is event-driven with highly variable flows and loads, with peak cBOD5 loadings of up to 12,188 kg/day. The entire treatment system is now designed to remove 3500 kg/day cBOD5 at a design flow of 40 l/s. It has a combined capacity of >44,000 m3 of wastewater with a retention time of approximately 21 days, depending on the pump flow rate which varies between 40 and 80 l/s. Nutrient dosing points have been positioned at strategic points throughout the whole system to prevent nutrient deficiency becoming a limiting factor in the development of a stable and viable mass of bacteria necessary to achieve the design criteria.

[1]  J. Higgins,et al.  The design & operation of a very large vertical sub-surface flow engineered wetland to treat spent deicing fluids and glycol-contaminated stormwater at Buffalo Niagara International Airport , 2011 .

[2]  P Cooper,et al.  The performance of vertical flow constructed wetland systems with special reference to the significance of oxygen transfer and hydraulic loading rates. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  R. Maranger,et al.  Nitrogen transformations and retention in planted and artificially aerated constructed wetlands. , 2009, Water research.

[4]  A J Saul,et al.  Baseline hydraulic performance of the Heathrow constructed wetlands subsurface flow system. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  L. Nitschke,et al.  Biological treatment of waste water containing glycols from de-icing agents , 1996 .

[6]  James Higgins,et al.  The use of a very large constructed sub-surface flow wetland to treat glycol-contaminated stormwater from aircraft De-icing operations , 2002 .

[7]  G. Parkin,et al.  Treatment of landfill leachate using an aerated, horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[8]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Evaluating trends in biofilm density using the UMCCA model. , 2004, Water research.

[9]  Scott Wallace,et al.  Oxygen transfer and consumption in subsurface flow treatment wetlands , 2013 .

[10]  Florent Chazarenc,et al.  Artificial aeration to increase pollutant removal efficiency of constructed wetlands in cold climate , 2006 .

[11]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[12]  Glen T. Daigger,et al.  Biological wastewater treatment. , 2011 .

[13]  D. Revitt,et al.  The integration of constructed wetlands into a treatment system for airport runoff. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.