Batoid wing skeletal structure: Novel morphologies, mechanical implications, and phylogenetic patterns

The skeleton of the “wings” of skates and rays consists of a series of radially oriented cartilaginous fin rays emanating from a modified pectoral girdle. Each fin ray consists of small, laterally oriented skeletal elements, radials, traditionally represented as simple cylindrical building blocks. High‐resolution radiography reveals the pattern of calcification in batoid wing elements, and their organization within the fin ray, to be considerably more complex and phylogenetically variable than previously thought. Calcification patterns of radials varied between families, as well as within individual pectoral fins. Oscillatory swimmers show structural interconnections between fin rays in central areas of the wing. Morphological variation was strongly predictive of locomotor strategy, which we attribute to oscillatory swimmers needing different areas of the wing stiffened than do undulatory swimmers. Contributions of various forms of calcification to radial stiffness were calculated theoretically. Results indicate that radials completely covered by mineralized tissue (“crustal calcification”) were stiffer than those that were calcified in chain‐like patterns (“catenated calcification”). Mapping this functionally important variation onto a phylogeny reveals a more complicated pattern than the literature suggests for the evolution of locomotor mode. Therefore, further investigation into the phylogenetic distribution of swimming mode is warranted. J. Morphol. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  L. Rosenberger,et al.  Pectoral fin locomotion in batoid fishes: undulation versus oscillation. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  F. Beer Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Statics and Dynamics , 2003 .

[3]  L. Grande,et al.  FRESHWATER STINGRAYS OF THE GREEN RIVER FORMATION OF WYOMING (EARLY EOCENE), WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES AND AN ANALYSIS OF ITS PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS (CHONDRICHTHYES: MYLIOBATIFORMES) , 2004 .

[4]  L. Compagno,et al.  Phyletic Relationships of Living Sharks and Rays , 1977 .

[5]  L. Compagno,et al.  Sharks of the world :an annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date , 1984 .

[6]  M. Stanhope,et al.  Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharks. , 2003, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

[7]  N. Lovejoy Systematics of myliobatoid elasmobranchs : with emphasis on the phylogeny and historical biogeography of neotropical freshwater stingrays ( Potamotrygonidae : Rajiformes ) , 1994 .

[8]  J. Clement Re-examination of the fine structure of endoskeletal mineralization in Chondrichthyans: Implications for growth, ageing and calcium Homeostasis , 1992 .

[9]  J. Ellis,et al.  Sharks, Skates, and Rays: the Biology of Elasmobranch Fishes , 2000 .

[10]  M. Westneat,et al.  Functional morphology of undulatory pectoral fin locomotion in the stingray taeniura lymma (Chondrichthyes: dasyatidae) , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[11]  Steven Vogel,et al.  Comparative Biomechanics: Life's Physical World , 2003 .

[12]  G Dingerkus,et al.  Enzyme clearing of alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. , 1977, Stain technology.

[13]  Norman E. Kemp,et al.  Ultrastructure of calcified cartilage in the endoskeletal tesserae of sharks , 1979, Journal of morphology.