Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World–Earth modeling framework

Analysis of Earth system dynamics in the Anthropocene requires to explicitly take into account the increasing magnitude of processes operating in human societies, their cultures, economies and technosphere and their growing feedback entanglement with those in the physical, chemical and biological systems of the planet. However, current state-of-the-art Earth System Models do not represent dynamic human societies and their feedback interactions with the biogeophysical Earth system and macroeconomic Integrated Assessment Models typically do so only with limited scope. This paper (i) proposes design principles for constructing World-Earth Models (WEM) for Earth system analysis of the Anthropocene, i.e., models of social (World) - ecological (Earth) co-evolution on up to planetary scales, and (ii) presents the copan:CORE open simulation modeling framework for developing, composing and analyzing such WEMs based on the proposed principles. The framework provides a modular structure to flexibly construct and study WEMs. These can contain biophysical (e.g. carbon cycle dynamics), socio-metabolic/economic (e.g. economic growth) and socio-cultural processes (e.g. voting on climate policies or changing social norms) and their feedback interactions, and are based on elementary entity types, e.g., grid cells and social systems. Thereby, copan:CORE enables the epistemic flexibility needed for contributions towards Earth system analysis of the Anthropocene given the large diversity of competing theories and methodologies used for describing socio-metabolic/economic and socio-cultural processes in the Earth system by various fields and schools of thought. To illustrate the capabilities of the framework, we present an exemplary and highly stylized WEM implemented in copan:CORE that illustrates how endogenizing socio-cultural processes and feedbacks could fundamentally change macroscopic model outcomes.

[1]  R. Bierstedt,et al.  The social order , 1957 .

[2]  D. Meadows,et al.  The limits to growth. A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. , 1972 .

[3]  R. Holley,et al.  Ergodic Theorems for Weakly Interacting Infinite Systems and the Voter Model , 1975 .

[4]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[5]  Marina Fischer-Kowalski,et al.  Society's metabolism: on the childhood and adolescence of a rising conceptual star , 1997 .

[6]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  Discourse: Earth System Analysis — The Scope of the Challenge , 1998 .

[7]  C. Folke,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 1998 .

[8]  O. Williamson Transaction Cost Economics: How It Works; Where It is Headed , 1998 .

[9]  Marcus Janssen,et al.  The battle of perspectives: a multi-agent model with adaptive responses to climate change , 1998 .

[10]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution , 1999, Nature.

[11]  C. Vlek,et al.  Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model , 2000 .

[12]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[13]  P. Crutzen Geology of mankind , 2002, Nature.

[14]  M. Janssen Complexity and Ecosystem Management: The Theory and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems , 2003 .

[15]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  The Mental Component of the Earth System , 2004 .

[16]  B. Hawkins,et al.  A framework: , 2020, Harmful Interaction between the Living and the Dead in Greek Tragedy.

[17]  C. Folke RESILIENCE: THE EMERGENCE OF A PERSPECTIVE FOR SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ANALYSES , 2006 .

[18]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[19]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  C. Müller,et al.  Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance , 2007 .

[21]  P. Crutzen,et al.  The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature , 2007, Ambio.

[22]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[23]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[25]  D. Foley,et al.  The economy needs agent-based modelling , 2009, Nature.

[26]  Joan Martinez-Alier,et al.  Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Languages of Valuation , 2009 .

[27]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[28]  Jim W Hall,et al.  Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[30]  P. McClintock,et al.  Revolutions that made the Earth , 2011 .

[31]  Peter M. Cox,et al.  Emergent dynamics of the climate–economy system in the Anthropocene , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Richard K. Betts,et al.  Conflict After the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace , 2012 .

[33]  P. Lukowicz,et al.  FuturICT: Participatory computing to understand and manage our complex world in a more sustainable and resilient way , 2012 .

[34]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  A comprehensive view on climate change: coupling of earth system and integrated assessment models , 2012 .

[35]  E. Dassau,et al.  Closing the loop , 2012, International journal of clinical practice. Supplement.

[36]  P. Haff Technology and human purpose: the problem of solids transport on the Earth's surface , 2012 .

[37]  Kate Raworth,et al.  A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? , 2012 .

[38]  Birgit Müller,et al.  NEW HORIZONS FOR MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW OF COUPLED SOCIAL‐ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS MODELING , 2012 .

[39]  Peter J. Menck,et al.  How basin stability complements the linear-stability paradigm , 2013, Nature Physics.

[40]  Nicola J. Grigg,et al.  Towards decision-based global land use models for improved understanding of the Earth system , 2013 .

[41]  J. Trancik,et al.  Statistical Basis for Predicting Technological Progress , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Will Steffen,et al.  The topology of non-linear global carbon dynamics: from tipping points to planetary boundaries , 2013 .

[43]  Timothy J. Garrett,et al.  Long‐run evolution of the global economy: 1. Physical basis , 2014 .

[44]  Peter K. Haff,et al.  Humans and technology in the Anthropocene: Six rules , 2014 .

[45]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Climate change: The necessary, the possible and the desirable Earth League climate statement on the implications for climate policy from the 5th IPCC Assessment , 2014 .

[46]  E. Kalnay,et al.  Methodological and Ideological Options Human and nature dynamics ( HANDY ) : Modeling inequality and use of resources in the collapse or sustainability of societies , 2014 .

[47]  M. Butler,et al.  Methods and Approaches , 2014 .

[48]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[49]  James P. M. Syvitski,et al.  Plug and Play Component Modeling - The CSDMS2.0 Approach , 2014 .

[50]  A. Arneth,et al.  Global models of human decision-making for land-based mitigation and adaptation assessment , 2014 .

[51]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Macroscopic description of complex adaptive networks coevolving with dynamic node states. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[52]  Jean-Francois Mercure,et al.  Climate model emulation in an integrated assessment framework: a case study for mitigation policies in the electricity sector , 2015 .

[53]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Horses for courses : analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries , 2015 .

[54]  J Kurths,et al.  The Dynamics of Coalition Formation on Complex Networks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[55]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model , 2015 .

[56]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[57]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Topology of sustainable management of dynamical systems with desirable states : from defining planetary boundaries to safe operating spaces in the Earth system , 2015 .

[58]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  The Atmosphere as a Global Commons , 2015 .

[59]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change , 2015 .

[60]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[61]  Thomas Nocke,et al.  Socio-economic data for global environmental change research , 2015 .

[62]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[63]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social–ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution , 2016 .

[64]  S. Rahmstorf,et al.  Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris , 2016 .

[65]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene , 2016 .

[66]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Constrained basin stability for studying transient phenomena in dynamical systems. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[67]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social norms as solutions , 2016, Science.

[68]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal , 2016 .

[69]  Timothy M. Lenton,et al.  Revolutions in energy input and material cycling in Earth history and human history , 2016 .

[70]  R. Kopp,et al.  Tipping elements and climate–economic shocks: Pathways toward integrated assessment , 2016, 1603.00850.

[71]  Thomas S. Lontzek,et al.  Risk of multiple interacting tipping points should encourage rapid CO2 emission reduction , 2016 .

[72]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  The technosphere in Earth System analysis: A coevolutionary perspective , 2017, 1704.06476.

[73]  Ulrich Parlitz,et al.  Sustainability, collapse and oscillations in a simple World-Earth model , 2017 .

[74]  Ulrich Parlitz,et al.  Sustainability, collapse and oscillations of global climate, population and economy in a simple World-Earth model , 2017 .

[75]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Analytically tractable climate-carbon cycle feedbacks under 21st century anthropogenic forcing , 2017 .

[76]  Rachel Marcus,et al.  Social vulnerability to climate change: a review of concepts and evidence , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[77]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Closing the loop: Reconnecting human dynamics to Earth System science , 2017 .

[78]  Andres Baeza,et al.  A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems , 2017 .

[79]  G. Baldassarre,et al.  Drought and flood in the Anthropocene: feedback mechanisms in reservoir operation , 2017 .

[80]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Towards representing human behavior and decision making in Earth system models – an overview of techniques and approaches , 2017 .

[81]  Wolfram Barfuss,et al.  From Math to Metaphors and Back Again: Social-Ecological Resilience from a Multi-Agent-Environment Perspective , 2017 .

[82]  Patrick W. Keys,et al.  On the social dynamics of moisture recycling , 2017, Earth System Dynamics.

[83]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Unifying Research on Social-Ecological Resilience and Collapse. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[84]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  A framework for modelling the complexities of food and water security under globalisation , 2017 .

[85]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[86]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Operationalization of Topology of Sustainable Management to Estimate Qualitatively Different Regions in State Space , 2017, 1706.04542.

[87]  W. Steffen,et al.  The Anthropocene equation , 2017 .

[88]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  How to represent human behavior and decision making in Earthsystem models? A guide to techniques and approaches , 2017 .

[89]  Julia K. Steinberger,et al.  A good life for all within planetary boundaries , 2018, Nature Sustainability.

[90]  On the social dynamics of moisture recycling , 2017, Earth System Dynamics.

[91]  Sara S. Metcalf,et al.  Linking models of human behaviour and climate alters projected climate change , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[92]  Juan C. Rocha,et al.  Defining tipping points for social-ecological systems scholarship—an interdisciplinary literature review , 2018 .

[93]  B. Latour,et al.  Gaia 2.0 , 2018, Science.

[94]  D. Gerten,et al.  On deeper human dimensions in Earth system analysis and modelling , 2018, Earth System Dynamics.

[95]  Niki Frantzeskaki,et al.  Positive tipping points in a rapidly warming world , 2018 .

[96]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Taxonomies for structuring models for World-Earth system analysisof the Anthropocene: subsystems, their interactions andsocial-ecological feedback loops , 2018 .

[97]  J. Kurths,et al.  When optimization for governing human-environment tipping elements is neither sustainable nor safe , 2018, Nature Communications.

[98]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system , 2017, Earth System Dynamics.

[99]  K. Calvin,et al.  Integrated human-earth system modeling—state of the science and future directions , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[100]  Jean-Denis Mathias,et al.  Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social–ecological systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[102]  Bottom-up linking of carbon markets under far-sighted cap coordination and reversibility , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[103]  J. Kurths,et al.  The physics of governance networks: critical transitions in contagion dynamics on multilayer adaptive networks with application to the sustainable use of renewable resources , 2019, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[104]  Richard J. Hewitt,et al.  Social Innovation in Community Energy in Europe: A Review of the Evidence , 2018, Front. Energy Res..

[105]  T. Lenton,et al.  Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against , 2019, Nature.

[106]  Matthew C. Ives,et al.  Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition , 2019, Science.

[107]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[108]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Shift the focus from the super-poor to the super-rich , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[109]  Domino Effects in the Earth System -- The potential role of wanted tipping points , 2019, 1911.10063.

[110]  Jon Norberg,et al.  A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene , 2019, Nature Sustainability.

[111]  Steven J. Lade,et al.  Cross-scale cooperation enables sustainable use of a common-pool resource , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[112]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Using agent-based modelling to simulate social-ecological systems across scales , 2019, GeoInformatica.

[113]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Human agency in the Anthropocene , 2020 .

[114]  I. Otto,et al.  Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.