Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis and Stabilization With a Lateral Mass Plate: Clinical and Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Lateral Mass Screw Placement and Associated Complications

Study Design A prospective study evaluating screw position and associated complications in 21 consecutive patients treated with a plate and screw fixation system applied to the lateral masses of the cervical spine. Objectives To determine the clinical safety of lateral mass screws by determining their anatomic location and clinical complications in a consecutive patient series. Summary of Background Data Lateral mass plating has been advocated for procedures in which wiring techniques cannot be used, especially in instances in which the posterior elements are deficient. Methods The first 21 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical arthrodesis and lateral mass plating with a single fixation system were reviewed prospectively. Computed tomography scans taken after surgery were reviewed independently by an orthopedic spinal surgeon and by a radiologist to evaluate screw tip position. Clinical and radiographic outcome was assessed at each visit after surgery. Results Ten of 164 (6.1%) lateral mass screws were malpositioned in six patients. Three symptomatic patients underwent four additional operative procedures to remove or replace the malpositioned screws. All patients had radiographic union, and no patient developed mechanical implant failure requiring removal of instrumentation. Radiographic evaluation noted that 17% of the screws were in the central axial zone of the lateral mass on computed tomography. Conclusions Lateral mass plating was associated with no vertebral artery or spinal cord injury. There was a 1.8%-per-screw risk of radiculopathy, which corresponds with published cadaveric studies. Radicular symptoms improved with screw removal in each case. The advantages of segmental fixation achieved with lateral mass plates and screws must be weighed

[1]  H. An,et al.  Anatomic Considerations for Plate‐Screw Fixation of the Cervical Spine , 1991, Spine.

[2]  R. Raynor,et al.  Cervical Spine Strength After Facet Injury and Spine Plate Application , 1991, Spine.

[3]  E. Jauch,et al.  Anatomic and biomechanical study of posterior cervical spine plate arthrodesis: an evaluation of two different techniques of screw placement. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[4]  R. Lufkin,et al.  MR imaging of the cervical spine: neurovascular anatomy. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  L. Claes,et al.  Comparative study of the stability of anterior and posterior cervical spine fixation procedures , 2004, Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery.

[6]  L Penning,et al.  CT myelographic findings in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine: clinical significance. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  RENE P. LOUIS,et al.  Posterior Internal Fixation with Screw Plates in Traumatic Lesions of the Cervical Spine , 1991, Spine.

[8]  V. Haughton,et al.  The cervical neural foramina: correlation of microtomy and CT anatomy. , 1985, Radiology.

[9]  F. Magerl,et al.  Posterior Stabilization of the Cervical Spine with Hook Plates , 1991, Spine.

[10]  W. Rauschning,et al.  Anatomical and morphometric studies in posterior cervical spinal screw-plate systems. , 1994, Journal of spinal disorders.

[11]  W. Rauschning,et al.  Postoperative cervical spine specimens studied with the cryoplaning technique. , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[12]  S R Garfin,et al.  Anatomic Comparison of the Roy‐Camille and Magerl Techniques for Screw Placement in the Lower Cervical Spine , 1991, Spine.

[13]  L. Claes,et al.  Biomechanics of Fixation Systems to the Cervical Spine , 1991, Spine.

[14]  H. Winn,et al.  Posterior Cervical Arthrodesis with AO Reconstruction Plates and Bone Graft , 1991, Spine.

[15]  K. Gill,et al.  Posterior Plating of the Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Posterior Fusion Techniques , 1988, Spine.