Structuring Decisions for Managing Threatened and Endangered Species in a Changing Climate

The management of endangered species under climate change is a challenging and often controversial task that incorporates input from a variety of different environmental, economic, social, and political interests. Yet many listing and recovery decisions for endangered species unfold on an ad hoc basis without reference to decision-aiding approaches that can improve the quality of management choices. Unlike many treatments of this issue, which consider endangered species management a science-based problem, we suggest that a clear decision-making process is equally necessary. In the face of new threats due to climate change, managers' choices about endangered species require closely linked analyses and deliberations that identify key objectives and develop measurable attributes, generate and compare management alternatives, estimate expected consequences and key sources of uncertainty, and clarify trade-offs across different dimensions of value. Several recent cases of endangered species conservation decisions illustrate our proposed decision-focused approach, including Gulf of Maine Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) recovery framework development, Cultus Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) management, and Upper Columbia River white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) recovery planning. Estructuración de Decisiones para Manejar Especies Amenazadas y en Peligro en un Clima Cambiante.

[1]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[2]  James E. Lyons,et al.  Monitoring in the Context of Structured Decision-Making and Adaptive Management , 2008 .

[3]  Ian J. Stewart,et al.  Defining Trade‐Offs among Conservation, Profitability, and Food Security in the California Current Bottom‐Trawl Fishery , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  P. Kareiva,et al.  How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation , 2005 .

[5]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  L. Gunderson How the Endangered Species Act Promotes Unintelligent, Misplaced Tinkering , 2013 .

[7]  P. Slovic The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[8]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[9]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Deliberative Trouble - Why Groups Go to Extremes , 2000 .

[10]  J. Arvai,et al.  Five propositions for improving decision making about the environment in developing communities: insights from the decision sciences. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  James Tansey,et al.  Adaptive Management of the Global Climate Problem: Bridging the Gap Between Climate Research and Climate Policy , 2006 .

[12]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Setting Conservation Priorities , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives , 2005, Oper. Res..

[14]  K. Hirsch,et al.  A structured decision-making approach to climate change adaptation in the forest sector , 2005 .

[15]  Sarah J. Converse,et al.  Special Issue Article: Adaptive management for biodiversity conservation in an uncertain world Which uncertainty? Using expert elicitation and expected value of information to design an adaptive program , 2011 .

[16]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Using Structured Decision Making to Help Implement a Precautionary Approach to Endangered Species Management , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices , 2012 .

[18]  W. Irvin Endangered species act. , 1993, Science.

[19]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[20]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  When Less is More: How Affect Influences Preferences When Comparing Low and High‐risk Options , 2006 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[22]  Michael J. Conroy,et al.  Application of decision theory to conservation management: recovery of Hector's dolphin , 2008 .

[23]  Michael C Runge,et al.  Structured decision making as a conceptual framework to identify thresholds for conservation and management. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  Leah Gerber,et al.  ARE WE RECOVERING? AN EVALUATION OF RECOVERY CRITERIA UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT , 2002 .

[25]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Process-based models are required to manage ecological systems in a changing world , 2013 .

[26]  E. Toman,et al.  Are Gray Wolves Endangered in the Northern Rocky Mountains? A Role for Social Science in Listing Determinations , 2010 .

[27]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values , 1997, Virology.

[28]  W. Thuiller Patterns and uncertainties of species' range shifts under climate change , 2004 .

[29]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[30]  R. Gregory,et al.  Deconstructing adaptive management: criteria for applications to environmental management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[32]  R. Gregory,et al.  When experts disagree (and better science won't help much): using structured deliberations to support endangered species recovery planning. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  M. Burgman Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[34]  ARE RECOVERY PLANS IMPROVING WITH PRACTICE , 2002 .

[35]  Carl D. Shapiro,et al.  Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior technical guide , 2009 .

[36]  M. Boykoff,et al.  Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the ‘Celebritization’ of climate change , 2009 .

[37]  S. Kafandaris Decision Sciences: An Integrative Perspective , 1993 .

[38]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Using Expert Judgments to Explore Robust Alternatives for Forest Management under Climate Change , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.