Learning through online discussion: A case of triangulation in research

This paper reports on issues in carrying out research into online discussion. The context is a study of a distance learning module within an MBA program. The module required students to tackle problems based on real life scenarios within small online groups. Students were studying part time and shared similar professional backgrounds. The research looked at students' overall evaluation of the module, ways in which group work was conducted, and the contribution of the tutor. The approach taken was an interpretive case study using questionnaire survey, text analysis and interviews. The main findings from the study are reported, but the focus is on the strengths of, and difficulties in, using the research methods. Triangulation of methods provides the researcher with a greater degree of confidence in reporting findings, although subjective interpretation is still needed.

[1]  Michael Hammond.  Issues associated with participation in on line forums—the case of the communicative learner , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[2]  David J. Miller,et al.  Beyond knowledge transmission? computer-supported learning in teacher education: some benefits in terms of stress, control and self-belief , 2000 .

[3]  Peter Twining,et al.  Assessing activity-based learning for a networked course , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  Wilfried Admiraal,et al.  Design Elements for a CSCL Environment in a Teacher Training Programme , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[5]  Margaret Mazzolini,et al.  Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Chris Colbourn,et al.  Mindweave: communication, computers and distance education , 1990 .

[7]  Kate Hawkey.  Social Constructivism and Asynchronous Text-Based Discussion: A Case Study with Trainee Teachers , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[8]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[9]  Sari Lindblom-Ylänne,et al.  Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[11]  Martin J. Weller.  Implementing a CMC tutor group for an existing distance education course , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Distance education via the Internet: the student experience , 2000, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[13]  Penny Collings,et al.  Sharing designer and user perspectives of web site evaluation: a cross-campus collaborative learning experience , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Robert Heckman,et al.  A Content Analytic Comparison of Learning Processes in Online and Face-to-Face Case Study Discussions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[16]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Catherine McLoughlin,et al.  Computer supported teamwork: An integrative approach to evaluating cooperative learning in an online environment , 2002 .

[18]  Janice Wearmouth,et al.  Computer conferencing with access to a 'guest expert' in the professional development of special educational needs coordinators , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[19]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[20]  A. Boder.  The process of knowledge reification in human-human interaction , 1992 .

[21]  Dilvan de Abreu Moreira,et al.  A Method to Increase Student Interaction Using Student Groups and Peer Review over the Internet , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[22]  J. Ralston,et al.  Sharpening the focus: methodological issues in analysing on-line conferences , 2003 .

[23]  Clare Brett,et al.  Off-line factors contributing to online engagement , 2004 .

[24]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[26]  Tom J. van Weert,et al.  Task-Based Team Learning with ICT, Design and Development of New Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[27]  Bruce White,et al.  Email Reducing Stress for Student Teachers , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[29]  David McConnell,et al.  Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning , 1994 .

[30]  Maggie Lamontagne,et al.  Collaboration and virtual mentoring: building relationships between pre-service and in-service special education teachers , 2000 .

[31]  Su White,et al.  Variety is the spice of life: student use of CMC in the context of campus based study , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Sarah Prestridge,et al.  A networked learning community approach to sustain teacher ICT professional development , 2003 .

[33]  Vivien Hodgson,et al.  Beyond Distance Teaching, Towards Open Learning , 1987 .

[34]  MazzoliniMargaret,et al.  Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums , 2003 .

[35]  Gi Woong Yun,et al.  Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  Dave J. Hobbs,et al.  The role of cognitive style in educational computer conferencing , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[37]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[38]  Margaret Foley McCabe.  Lessons from the field: computer conferencing in higher education , 1998 .

[39]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  Mirror, mirror, on my screen≡ Exploring online reflections , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[40]  Patricia Arnold,et al.  Communities of Practice: guidelines for the design of online seminars in higher education , 2001 .

[41]  Despina Galanouli,et al.  Using unmediated computer conferencing to promote reflective practice and confidencebuilding in initial teacher education , 2000 .

[42]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Communication in a web-based conferencing system: the quality of computer-mediated interactions , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[43]  Raven Wallace,et al.  Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students , 2003 .

[44]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Models to evaluate online learning communities of asynchronous discussion forums , 2003 .

[45]  Taina Kaivola,et al.  Collaborative knowledge building to promote in-service teacher training in environmental education , 2001 .

[46]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Authority and convergence in collaborative learning , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful Learning Environments , 2003 .

[48]  Daniel V. Eastmond.  E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[49]  C. Jones,et al.  Experiences of assessment: using phenomenography for evaluation , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  Alexander Massey.  METHODOLOGICAL TRIANGULATION, OR HOW TO GET LOST WITHOUT BEING FOUND OUT , 1999 .

[51]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[52]  James Boyle,et al.  Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environments in university teaching: a review and case study , 2000, Comput. Educ..