Different forms of perturbation theory for the calculation of the correlation energy

Different forms of perturbation theory for the calculation of correlation energy in both closed-and open-shell systems are discussed. For closed-shell systems, Epstein–Nesbet perturbation theory is compared with Moller–Plesset (MP) perturbation theory based on canonical Hartree–Fock orbitals and with MP theory based on internally consistent SCF orbitals. The traditional MP theory gives superior results despite its use of an inferior zeroth-order Hamiltonian. This behavior is rationalized in terms of the larger denominators present in the traditional MP theory. These conclusions are used to support the restricted open-shell perturbation methods proposed recently by Murray and Davidson, and these new methods are compared with spin-restricted Epstein–Nesbet theory and the unrestricted MP (UMP) approach. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Ernest R. Davidson,et al.  Perturbation theory for open shell systems , 1991 .

[2]  Clemens C. J. Roothaan,et al.  New Developments in Molecular Orbital Theory , 1951 .

[3]  Peter J. Knowles,et al.  Restricted Møller—Plesset theory for open-shell molecules , 1991 .

[4]  J. Baker An investigation of the annihilated unrestricted Hartree–Fock wave function and its use in second‐order Mo/ller–Plesset perturbation theory , 1989 .

[5]  V. R. Saunders,et al.  On methods for converging open-shell Hartree-Fock wave-functions , 1974 .

[6]  Isaiah Shavitt,et al.  Comparison of high-order many-body perturbation theory and configuration interaction for H2O , 1977 .

[7]  H. Bernhard Schlegel,et al.  Potential energy curves using unrestricted Mo/ller–Plesset perturbation theory with spin annihilation , 1986 .

[8]  P.-O. Loewdin,et al.  Studies in Perturbation Theory. IX. Connection Between Various Approaches in the Recent Development—Evaluation of Upper Bounds to Energy Eigenvalues in Schrödinger's Perturbation Theory , 1965 .

[9]  E. Davidson,et al.  An approximation to frozen natural orbitals through the use of the Hartree–Fock exchange potential , 1981 .

[10]  W. Goddard,et al.  Excited States of H2O using improved virtual orbitals , 1969 .

[11]  E. Davidson The iterative calculation of a few of the lowest eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors of large real-symmetric matrices , 1975 .

[12]  N. Handy,et al.  Spin contamination in single-determinant wavefunctions , 1991 .

[13]  Y. Smeyers,et al.  Half‐Projected and Projected Hartree‐Fock Calculations for Singlet Ground States. i. four‐Electron Atomic Systems , 1973 .

[14]  Russell M. Pitzer,et al.  An SCF method for hole states , 1976 .

[15]  John F. Stanton,et al.  Many-body perturbation theory with a restricted open-shell Hartree—Fock reference , 1991 .

[16]  Ivan Hubač,et al.  Correlation energy of open-shell systems. Application of the many-body Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory in the restricted Roothaan-Hartree-Fock formalism , 1980 .

[17]  E. Davidson Selection of the Proper Canonical Roothaan-Hartree-Fock Orbitals for Particular Applications. I. Theory , 1972 .

[18]  Kimihiko Hirao,et al.  The calculation of higher-order energies in the many-body perturbation theory series , 1985 .

[19]  Peter J. Knowles,et al.  Open-shell M∅ller—Plesset perturbation theory , 1991 .

[20]  R. Bartlett Many-Body Perturbation Theory and Coupled Cluster Theory for Electron Correlation in Molecules , 1981 .

[21]  Kerstin Andersson,et al.  Second-order perturbation theory with a CASSCF reference function , 1990 .

[22]  P. Taylor,et al.  A full CI treatment of the 1A1-3B1 separation in methylene , 1986 .

[23]  C. C. J. Roothaan,et al.  Self-Consistent Field Theory for Open Shells of Electronic Systems , 1960 .

[24]  N. Handy,et al.  Convergence of projected unrestricted Hartee-Fock Moeller-Plesset series. , 1988 .

[25]  R. K. Nesbet,et al.  Self‐Consistent Orbitals for Radicals , 1954 .

[26]  E. Davidson,et al.  Many‐body perturbation theory and phosphorescence: Application to CH2 , 1982 .

[27]  E. Davidson Calculation of Natural Orbitals and Wavefunctions by Perturbation Theory , 1968 .

[28]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Über die Zuordnung von Wellenfunktionen und Eigenwerten zu den Einzelnen Elektronen Eines Atoms , 1934 .

[29]  V. R. Saunders,et al.  A “Level–Shifting” method for converging closed shell Hartree–Fock wave functions , 1973 .