Application of a three-dimensional printed pelvic model in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

Introduction To investigate the application value of a three-dimensional (3D) printed pelvic model in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. Methods Clinical data of patients undergoing laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery in The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang City from May 2020 to April 2022 were selected. Patients were randomly divided into general imaging examination group (control group, n=25) and 3D printing group (observation group, n=25) by random number table method, and the perioperative situation of patients in the two groups was compared. Results There was no significant difference in general data between the two groups (p>0.05). Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative time to locate inferior mesenteric artery, intraoperative time to locate left colic artery, first postoperative exhaust time and length of hospital stay in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); There were no significant differences in the total number of lymph nodes and complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Discussion The application of 3D printed pelvic model in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer is conducive to understanding pelvic structure and mesenteric vascular anatomy, reducing intraoperative bleeding and shortening operation time, which is worthy of further clinical application.

[1]  F. Bello,et al.  Current and future role of three-dimensional modelling technology in rectal cancer surgery: A systematic review , 2021, World journal of gastrointestinal surgery.

[2]  S. Ishihara,et al.  Improvement in Surgical Outcomes Using 3-Dimensional Printed Models for Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer , 2021, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  S. Ishihara,et al.  Utility of a Three-Dimensional Printed Pelvic Model for Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  N. Byrne,et al.  Patient-specific 3D Printing: A Novel Technique for Complex Pediatric Renal Transplantation , 2019, Annals of surgery.

[6]  S. Wexner,et al.  Systematic review of the applications of three‐dimensional printing in colorectal surgery , 2018, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[7]  Ke-xin Wang,et al.  Vascular anatomy of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic radical resection with the preservation of left colic artery for rectal cancer , 2018, World journal of gastroenterology.

[8]  J. Fasel,et al.  Implementation of 3D printed superior mesenteric vascular models for surgical planning and/or navigation in right colectomy with extended D3 mesenterectomy: comparison of virtual and physical models to the anatomy found at surgery , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[9]  R. Sindhu,et al.  Low-tie IMA and selective D3 lymph node sampling in laparoscopic rectal resection for carcinoma rectum: comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes with the open technique. , 2017, Journal of gastrointestinal oncology.

[10]  Jun Mitani,et al.  A novel three-dimensional print of liver vessels and tumors in hepatectomy , 2017, Surgery Today.

[11]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Value of 3D printing for the comprehension of surgical anatomy , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  P. Gemmel,et al.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review , 2016, Biomedical engineering online.

[13]  M. Sugimoto,et al.  Patient-specific 3-dimensional Printed Kidney Designed for "4D" Surgical Navigation: A Novel Aid to Facilitate Minimally Invasive Off-clamp Partial Nephrectomy in Complex Tumor Cases. , 2016, Urology.

[14]  P. Quirke,et al.  Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[15]  A. Laghi,et al.  Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  C. Boselli,et al.  High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. , 2012, Surgical oncology.

[17]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[18]  N. Avenia,et al.  High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery: a protocol for a systematic review , 2011, World journal of surgical oncology.

[19]  J. E. Jansen,et al.  Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? , 2011, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[20]  M. Büchler,et al.  The Impact of the Introduction of Total Mesorectal Excision on Local Recurrence Rate and Survival in Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  A. Sanabria,et al.  Randomized controlled trial. , 2005, World journal of surgery.

[22]  L Påhlman,et al.  Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Huichao Feng,et al.  A protocol for a systematic review , 2019 .

[24]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Three-dimensional printing as an educational tool in colorectal surgery. , 2019, Frontiers in bioscience.

[25]  Teresa Foo,et al.  : SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[26]  R. Scott,et al.  Long-Term Results , 2001 .