Computational Detection of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI Using Deep Learning

Simple Summary In approximately 50% of prostate cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment, cancer has extended beyond the prostate boundary (i.e., extraprostatic extension). The aim of our study was to expand artificial intelligence (AI) models that identify cancer in the prostate to also identify the cancer that spreads outside the boundary of the prostate. By combining past models with image post-processing steps and clinical decision rules, we built an autonomous approach to detect the extension of the cancer beyond the prostate boundary using prostate MRI. Our study included 123 prostate cancer patients (38 with extraprostatic extension), and our proposed method can detect cancer outside the prostate boundary in more cases than radiologists. Abstract The localization of extraprostatic extension (EPE), i.e., local spread of prostate cancer beyond the prostate capsular boundary, is important for risk stratification and surgical planning. However, the sensitivity of EPE detection by radiologists on MRI is low (57% on average). In this paper, we propose a method for computational detection of EPE on multiparametric MRI using deep learning. Ground truth labels of cancers and EPE were obtained in 123 patients (38 with EPE) by registering pre-surgical MRI with whole-mount digital histopathology images from radical prostatectomy. Our approach has two stages. First, we trained deep learning models using the MRI as input to generate cancer probability maps both inside and outside the prostate. Second, we built an image post-processing pipeline that generates predictions for EPE location based on the cancer probability maps and clinical knowledge. We used five-fold cross-validation to train our approach using data from 74 patients and tested it using data from an independent set of 49 patients. We compared two deep learning models for cancer detection: (i) UNet and (ii) the Correlated Signature Network for Indolent and Aggressive prostate cancer detection (CorrSigNIA). The best end-to-end model for EPE detection, which we call EPENet, was based on the CorrSigNIA cancer detection model. EPENet was successful at detecting cancers with extraprostatic extension, achieving a mean area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.72 at the patient-level. On the test set, EPENet had 80.0% sensitivity and 28.2% specificity at the patient-level compared to 50.0% sensitivity and 76.9% specificity for the radiologists. To account for spatial location of predictions during evaluation, we also computed results at the sextant-level, where the prostate was divided into sextants according to standard systematic 12-core biopsy procedure. At the sextant-level, EPENet achieved mean sensitivity 61.1% and mean specificity 58.3%. Our approach has the potential to provide the location of extraprostatic extension using MRI alone, thus serving as an independent diagnostic aid to radiologists and facilitating treatment planning.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2022 , 2022, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Richard E. Fan,et al.  Selective identification and localization of indolent and aggressive prostate cancers via CorrSigNIA: an MRI-pathology correlation and deep learning framework , 2021, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  C. Park,et al.  Revisiting extraprostatic extension based on invasion depth and number for new algorithm for substaging of pT3a prostate cancer , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Ying Hou,et al.  Artificial intelligence is a promising prospect for the detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension with mpMRI: a two-center comparative study , 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  MRI index lesion radiomics and machine learning for detection of extraprostatic extension of disease: a multicenter study , 2021, European Radiology.

[6]  M. Harisinghani,et al.  The absolute tumor-capsule contact length in the diagnosis of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer , 2021, Abdominal Radiology.

[7]  Richard E. Fan,et al.  Automated detection of aggressive and indolent prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging , 2021, Medical physics.

[8]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  V. Patel,et al.  Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Current perspectives , 2020, Asian journal of urology.

[10]  Mitko Veta,et al.  Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  C. Iselin,et al.  External Validation of a Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Nomogram for the Prediction of Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. , 2020, European urology.

[12]  Indrani Bhattacharya,et al.  CorrSigNet: Learning CORRelated Prostate Cancer SIGnatures from Radiology and Pathology Images for Improved Computer Aided Diagnosis , 2020, MICCAI.

[13]  Wei Shao,et al.  Registration of presurgical MRI and histopathology images from radical prostatectomy via RAPSODI , 2020, Medical physics.

[14]  Hao Sun,et al.  Radiomics Based on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[15]  Imon Banerjee,et al.  An Automated Two-step Pipeline for Aggressive Prostate Lesion Detection from Multi-parametric MR Sequence. , 2020, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[16]  S. Tirumani,et al.  Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists , 2020, Abdominal Radiology.

[17]  Jeong Kon Kim,et al.  Extraprostatic Tumor Extension: Comparison of Preoperative Multiparametric MRI Criteria and Histopathologic Correlation after Radical Prostatectomy. , 2020, Radiology.

[18]  H. Hricak,et al.  The Diagnostic Performance of the Length of Tumor Capsular Contact on MRI for Detecting Prostate Cancer Extraprostatic Extension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Korean journal of radiology.

[19]  A. Tewari,et al.  Performance of prostate multiparametric MRI for prediction of prostate cancer extraprostatic extension according to NCCN risk categories: implication for surgical planning. , 2020, Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology.

[20]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Radiomic features derived from periprostatic fat on pre-surgical T2w MRI predict extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer identified on post-surgical pathology: preliminary results , 2020, Medical Imaging.

[21]  C. Beisland,et al.  Magnetic resonance radiomics for prediction of extraprostatic extension in non-favorable intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients , 2020, Acta radiologica.

[22]  P. Choyke A Grading System for Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer That We Can All Agree Upon? , 2020, Radiology. Imaging cancer.

[23]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Artificial intelligence in multiparametric prostate cancer imaging with focus on deep-learning methods , 2020, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[24]  F. Montorsi,et al.  The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. , 2020, European urology.

[25]  Zhiyong Lin,et al.  MRI‐Based Radiomics Signature for the Preoperative Prediction of Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  Manuel Wiesenfarth,et al.  Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment. , 2019, Radiology.

[27]  D. Tang,et al.  Assessment of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (Review) , 2019, International journal of oncology.

[28]  Arturo Brunetti,et al.  Detection of Extraprostatic Extension of Cancer on Biparametric MRI Combining Texture Analysis and Machine Learning: Preliminary Results. , 2019, Academic radiology.

[29]  Ruiming Cao,et al.  Joint Prostate Cancer Detection and Gleason Score Prediction in mp-MRI via FocalNet , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  Clayton P Smith,et al.  A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI. , 2019, Radiology.

[31]  S. Eberhardt Local Staging of Prostate Cancer with MRI: A Need for Standardization. , 2019, Radiology.

[32]  Nathan Lay,et al.  Prostate cancer detection from multi-institution multiparametric MRIs using deep convolutional neural networks , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[33]  Xiuheng Liu,et al.  Intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves patients’ postoperative continence recovery and erectile function , 2018, Medicine.

[34]  Nicola Schieda,et al.  Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  M. Baghdadi,et al.  Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: what does it mean? , 2018, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[36]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. , 2016, European urology.

[37]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[38]  Saining Xie,et al.  Holistically-Nested Edge Detection , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[39]  Kirby G. Vosburgh,et al.  3D Slicer: A Platform for Subject-Specific Image Analysis, Visualization, and Clinical Support , 2014 .

[40]  L. Kiemeney,et al.  The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[41]  J. Madden,et al.  WITHDRAWN: Can the conventional sextant prostate biopsy reliably diagnose unilateral prostate cancer in low-risk, localized, prostate cancer? , 2008, Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases.

[42]  P. Carroll,et al.  Sextant prostate biopsies predict side and sextant site of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[43]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  David G. Bostwick,et al.  Urologic Surgical Pathology , 1997 .