Evaluating Virtual Cells and Multistage Flow Shops: An Analytical Approach

The implementation of cellular manufacturing can be carried out through the creation of manufacturing cells (i.e., groups of dissimilar machines dedicated to a set of part types that are placed in close proximity to one another) or virtual cells (i.e., the dedication of specific machines within the current departments to a prespecified set of part types). Typically, the former involves the reorganization of the shop floor and provides the operational benefit of reduced materials handling. On the other hand, the latter configuration is simpler to implement and easier to reconfigure in light of product demand changes, but it may not offer the same operational benefits. In this paper, we propose and validate analytical approximations for comparing the performance of virtual cells and multistage flow shops. Using these approximations and hypothetical data, we identify some key factors that influence the implementation of virtual cells in a multistage flow shop environment. We conclude with an application of our approximations to industrial data.

[1]  Rajiv M. Gupta,et al.  An examination of the dynamic behaviour of part-families in group technology , 1982 .

[2]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Coping with the Loss of Pooling Synergy in Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 1994 .

[3]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Redesigning a Cellular Manufacturing System to Handle Long-Term Demand Changes: A Methodology and Investigation* , 1993 .

[4]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  Cellular manufacturing in the U.S. industry: a survey of users , 1989 .

[5]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Methods of Cell Formation in Group Technology: A Framework for Evaluation , 1986 .

[6]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  A simulation comparison of group technology with traditional job shop manufacturing , 1986 .

[7]  Randall P. Sadowski,et al.  Introduction to Simulation Using Siman , 1990 .

[8]  Timothy L. Smunt,et al.  Countering the negative impact of intercell flow in cellular manufacturing / 1991:121 , 1991 .

[9]  John M. Charnes,et al.  Cellular Versus Functional Layouts Under a Variety of Shop Operating Conditions , 1993 .

[10]  Vijay R. Kannan,et al.  A Virtual Cellular Manufacturing Approach to Batch Production , 1996 .

[11]  F. W. Craven Some Constraints, Fallacies and Solutions in Gt Applications , 1974 .

[12]  John L. Burbidge,et al.  The introduction of group technology , 1975 .

[13]  Tom M. Cavalier,et al.  Virtual manufacturing cells: exploiting layout design and intercell flows for the machine sharing problem , 1993 .

[14]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Lot-Sizing and Lead-time Performance in a Manufacturing Cell , 1985 .

[15]  C. L. Ang,et al.  A comparative study of the performance of pure and hybrid group technology manufacturing systems using computer simulation techniques , 1984 .

[16]  Nallan C. Suresh Partitioning Work Centers for Group Technology: Analytical Extension and Shop-Level Simulation Investigation* , 1992 .

[17]  W. Whitt,et al.  The Queueing Network Analyzer , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[18]  Kathryn E. Stecke,et al.  The Optimality of Unbalancing Both Workloads and Machine Group Sizes in Closed Queueing Networks of Multiserver Queues , 1985, Oper. Res..

[19]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  A methodology for designing flexible cellular manufacturing systems , 1997 .

[20]  John B. Jensen,et al.  Machine dedication and process flexibility in a group technology environment , 1996 .

[21]  John S. Morris,et al.  A simulation analysis of factors influencing the attractiveness of group technology cellular layouts , 1990 .

[22]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Performance of manufacturing cells for group technology: a parametric analysis , 1995 .

[23]  S. M. Shafer,et al.  Off setting lower routeing flexibility incellular manufacturing due to machine dedication , 1997 .

[24]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  Applications and Implementation: AN EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF CELLULAR (GROUP TECHNOLOGY) LAYOUT WITH PROCESS LAYOUT , 1987 .

[25]  Nallan C. Suresh Partitioning Work Centers for Group Technology: Insights from an Analytical Model* , 1991 .