A proposal for a minimalist ontology

This paper seeks to answer the following question: What is a minimal set of entities that form an ontology of the natural world, given our well-established physical theories? The proposal is that the following two axioms are sufficient to obtain such a minimalist ontology: (1) There are distance relations that individuate simple objects, namely matter points. (2) The matter points are permanent, with the distances between them changing. I sketch out how one can obtain our well-established physical theories on the basis of just these two axioms. The argument for minimalism in ontology then is that it yields all the explanations that one can reasonably demand in science and philosophy, while avoiding the drawbacks that come with a richer ontology.

[1]  G. W. Leibniz,et al.  Die Philosophischen Schriften , 1960 .

[2]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  Ontic Structural Realism as a Metaphysics of Objects , 2010 .

[3]  S. Saunders.  Are quantum particles objects , 2006 .

[4]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[5]  N. Huggett.  The Regularity Account of Relational Spacetime , 2006 .

[6]  Elizabeth Miller.  Quantum Entanglement, Bohmian Mechanics, and Humean Supervenience , 2014 .

[7]  S. Colin,et al.  A Dirac sea pilot-wave model for quantum field theory , 2007, quant-ph/0701085.

[8]  Jukka Keränen,et al.  The Identity Problem for Realist Structuralism , 2001 .

[9]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[10]  James Ladyman,et al.  Scientific Structuralism: On The Identity and Diversity of Objects in a Structure , 2007 .

[11]  David Lewis,et al.  Papers in metaphysics and epistemology: Humean Supervenience debugged , 1999 .

[12]  Jonathan Schaffer,et al.  Monism: The Priority of the Whole , 2010 .

[13]  M Esfeld,et al.  Holism and analytic philosophy , 1998 .

[14]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  The Metaphysics Within Physics , 2007 .

[15]  H. Bhogal,et al.  What the Humean Should Say About Entanglement , 2017 .

[16]  J. Ladyman,et al.  Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized , 2007 .

[17]  Quantum Physics Without Quantum Philosophy , 2013 .

[18]  Detlef Dürr,et al.  The Ontology of Bohmian Mechanics , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[19]  T. Maudlin.  Can the World be Only Wavefunction , 2010 .

[20]  Leibnizian relationalism for general relativistic physics , 2016, 1608.07257.

[21]  B. Devoto.  A Better Best System Account of Lawhood , 2009 .

[22]  S. Goldstein,et al.  On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Theory , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[23]  Are There Material Objects in Bohm's Theory? , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[24]  Vincent Lam.  Geometric Possibility , 2012 .

[25]  D. Lewis,et al.  Symposium: Chance and CredenceHumean Supervenience Debugged , 1994 .

[26]  A persistent particle ontology for QFT in terms of the Dirac sea , 2016, 1608.06141.

[27]  S. Weidenschilling,et al.  A plurality of worlds , 1991, Nature.

[28]  B. Loewer.  Two accounts of laws and time , 2012 .

[29]  M. Esfeld,et al.  The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science , 1957, Nature.

[30]  S. Mumford,et al.  Relations all the way down? Against ontic structural realism , 2016 .

[31]  J. Wheeler,et al.  Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation , 1945 .

[32]  D. Marshall,et al.  Humean laws and explanation , 2015 .

[33]  Marc Lange.  Grounding, scientific explanation, and Humean laws , 2013 .

[34]  Luiseach Nic Eoin.  Laws of nature , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[35]  Jonathan Schaffer,et al.  The Internal Relatedness of All Things , 2010 .

[36]  S. French.  The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation , 2014 .

[37]  H. Castañeda.  Causes, Energy and Constant Conjunctions , 1980 .

[38]  P. Pettit.  The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics , 1996 .

[39]  T. Bigaj.  Dissecting weak discernibility of quanta , 2015 .

[40]  Elizabeth Miller.  Humean scientific explanation , 2015 .

[41]  Michael Esfeld,et al.  Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations , 2004 .

[42]  Hartry Field.  Can We Dispense with Space-Time? , 1984, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[43]  T. Maudlin.  The Universal and the Local in Quantum Theory , 2015, Synthese Library.

[44]  Alexander J Bird,et al.  Nature's metaphysics : laws and properties , 2007 .

[45]  Craig Callender,et al.  One world, one beable , 2014, Synthese.

[46]  Quantum Humeanism, or: physicalism without properties , 2014, 1403.5666.

[47]  R. Feynman.  The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics. , 1966, Science.

[48]  P. Pettit,et al.  The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. , 1995 .

[49]  Ned Hall.  Humean Reductionism about Laws of Nature , 2015 .

[50]  Marc Lange.  An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics: Locality, Fields, Energy, and Mass , 2002 .

[51]  Kerry McKenzie.  Priority and Particle Physics: Ontic Structural Realism as a Fundamentality Thesis , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[52]  B. Bertotti,et al.  Mach’s principle and the structure of dynamical theories , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.