A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

Tests or measures in clinical medicine or the social sciences can be used for three purposes: discriminating between subjects, predicting either prognosis or the results of some other test, and evaluating change over time. The choices made at each stage of constructing a quality of life index will differ depending on the purpose of the instrument. We explore the implications of index purpose for each stage of instrument development: selection of the item pool, item scaling, item reduction, determination of reliability, of validity, and of responsiveness. At many of these stages, not only are the requirements for discriminative, predictive, and evaluative instruments not complementary, they are actually competing. Attention to instrument purpose will clarify the choices both for those developing quality of life measures and for those selecting an appropriate instrument for clinical studies.

[1]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[2]  J. Ware,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study , 1979 .

[3]  J. Guilford.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[4]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[5]  E. Wagner,et al.  The Duke-UNC Health Profile: An Adult Health Status Instrument for Primary Care , 1981, Medical care.

[6]  W. Frankenburg,et al.  The revised Denver Developmental Screening Test: its accuracy as a screening instrument. , 1971, The Journal of pediatrics.

[7]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner. , 1974, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Dobson,et al.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[9]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  M. W. Richardson,et al.  The theory of the estimation of test reliability , 1937 .

[11]  L. Chambers,et al.  The development and application of indices of health: general methods and a summary of results. , 1977, American journal of public health.

[12]  P. Tugwell,et al.  A methodological framework to develop and select indices for clinical trials: statistical and judgmental approaches. , 1982, The Journal of rheumatology.

[13]  E M Backett,et al.  A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. , 1980, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement for Evaluation Research and Policy Analysis , 1982 .

[15]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[16]  P. Gertman,et al.  Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  L. Guttman.  A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .

[18]  Schumacher Hr.  Rheumatology and rheumatic disease in the Republic of China. , 1982 .

[19]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance , 1981 .

[20]  R M Kaplan,et al.  Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. , 1976, Health services research.

[21]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.