Satisfaction aware QoS-based bidirectional service mapping in cloud environment

Due to large-scale growth in the number of service providers and consumers in cloud, their efficient mapping has become a complex undertaking. In most of the recent research works, quality of service (QoS) based selection of a service provider for a consumer has been recommended for service mapping. This is a unidirectional approach where the mapping of service is based on the service providers’ evaluation in the context of QoS requirements of a consumer. But, in the business perspective of cloud, the bidirectional evaluation of the participating entities (service providers and consumers) in the mapping process is necessary for increasing their service satisfaction. Therefore, this paper proposes a mutual evaluation-based cloud service mapping (MECSM) framework which addresses the bidirectional evaluation of both the service providers and consumers. MECSM framework uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process method to evaluate the service providers and standard RFM (Recency, Frequency, and Monetary) model to evaluate the consumers. A mathematical model is evolved to draw the service satisfaction of the service provider and consumer involved in a service transaction. The process of service mapping is depicted through a case study. The stability of the MECSM framework is validated by performing the sensitivity analysis. For performance analysis, the scaling range of service providers and consumers in a controlled overhead is obtained through the extensive simulation experiments. A comparison of results with the existing service mapping frameworks proves its better performance in the cloud.

[1]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Li Liu,et al.  Ontology-based service matching in cloud computing , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[3]  Jyothi Shetty,et al.  Quality of service driven cloud service ranking and selection algorithm using REMBRANDT approach , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM).

[4]  Elizabeth Chang,et al.  Cloud service selection: State-of-the-art and future research directions , 2014, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[5]  Mohamed Othman,et al.  Cost-aware service brokering and performance sentient load balancing algorithms in the cloud , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[6]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making , 2001 .

[7]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[8]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  NMCDA: A framework for evaluating cloud computing services , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[9]  Neha Garg,et al.  Task Deadline-Aware Energy-Efficient Scheduling Model for a Virtualized Cloud , 2018 .

[10]  Haleem Farman,et al.  Toward Integrating Vehicular Clouds with IoT for Smart City Services , 2019, IEEE Network.

[11]  Yurdaer N. Doganata,et al.  Selecting Optimum Cloud Availability Zones by Learning User Satisfaction Levels , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[12]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  VIKOR Technique: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications , 2016 .

[13]  Customer Ranking Model for Project Businesses: A Case Study from the Automotive Industry , 2014 .

[14]  V. S. Shankar Sriram,et al.  A computational model for ranking cloud service providers using hypergraph based techniques , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[15]  Erik Rolland,et al.  Modeling customer satisfaction from unstructured data using a Bayesian approach , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Utilizing customer satisfaction in ranking prediction for personalized cloud service selection , 2017, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Walid Gaaloul,et al.  A semantic framework for configurable business process as a service in the cloud , 2016, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[18]  Hoi Chan,et al.  Ranking and mapping of applications to cloud computing services by SVD , 2010, 2010 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium Workshops.

[19]  Albert Y. Zomaya,et al.  Customer-Satisfaction-Aware Optimal Multiserver Configuration for Profit Maximization in Cloud Computing , 2019 .

[20]  Albert Y. Zomaya,et al.  Tradeoffs Between Profit and Customer Satisfaction for Service Provisioning in the Cloud , 2011, HPDC '11.

[21]  Kenli Li,et al.  Customer-Satisfaction-Aware Optimal Multiserver Configuration for Profit Maximization in Cloud Computing , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing.

[22]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  A framework for ranking of cloud computing services , 2013, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[23]  Vahideh Hayyolalam,et al.  A systematic literature review on QoS-aware service composition and selection in cloud environment , 2018, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[24]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Research on Lifting Techniques of Large Segments of Steel Box Girder of Chongqi Bridge , 2012 .

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making , 2016 .

[26]  Hsin-Hung Wu,et al.  A review of the application of RFM model , 2010 .

[27]  Avnish Thakur,et al.  A taxonomic survey on load balancing in cloud , 2017, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[28]  Hsin-Hung Wu,et al.  A case study of applying data mining techniques in an outfitter's customer value analysis , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Haiying Shen,et al.  An Efficient and Trustworthy Resource Sharing Platform for Collaborative Cloud Computing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[30]  Jia Liang Liu,et al.  A QoS Evaluation Model in the Environment of Cloud Computing , 2012 .

[31]  Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Cloud computing - The business perspective , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Conflict and tradeoffs in decision making, Elke U. Weber, Jonathan Baron and Graham Loomes (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, 347 pp., ISBN 0‐521‐77238‐9 (hb) , 2003 .

[33]  Wei Jianping Research on VIP customer classification rule base on RFM model , 2011, MSIE 2011.

[34]  Soo Dong Kim,et al.  QoS Metrics for Evaluating Services from the Perspective of Service Providers , 2007, IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE'07).

[35]  Hidekazu Tsuji,et al.  A new QoS ontology and its QoS-based ranking algorithm for Web services , 2009, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[36]  I. Yuniwati Correlation Test Application of Supplier’s Ranking Using TOPSIS and AHP-TOPSIS Method , 2016 .

[37]  Lakshmi Muddana,et al.  Access control model with enhanced flexibility and scalability for cloud , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT).

[38]  Major Singh Goraya,et al.  Two-way Ranking Based Service Mapping in Cloud Environment , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[39]  Amaryllis Mavragani,et al.  Open Economy, Institutional Quality, and Environmental Performance: A Macroeconomic Approach , 2016 .

[40]  Deo Prakash Vidyarthi,et al.  A framework for selection of best cloud service provider using ranked voting method , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC).

[41]  Wei Jianping Research on customer classification rule extraction base on RFM model and rough set , 2010, The 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering.

[42]  DongHai,et al.  Cloud service selection , 2014 .

[43]  Barry L. Nelson,et al.  Shapley Effects for Global Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Computation , 2016, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantification.

[44]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  The Business Perspective on Cloud Computing - A Literature Review of Research on Cloud Computing , 2012, AMCIS.

[45]  Xiaowei Yang,et al.  CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers , 2010, IMC '10.

[46]  Amir Khanlari,et al.  CUSTOMER LIFETIME VALUE (CLV) MEASUREMENT BASED ON RFM MODEL , 2007 .

[47]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  Investigating QoS of Real-World Web Services , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[48]  Byung-Seo Kim,et al.  Information-Centric Network-Based Vehicular Communications: Overview and Research Opportunities , 2018, Sensors.

[49]  R. Oliver Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. , 1977 .