Resistance against Fracture in Teeth Managed by Root Canal Treatment on Restoring with Onlays, Inlays, and Endocrowns: A Comparative Analysis.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE To compare the fracture resistance in teeth managed by root canal treatment after restoring with different types of onlays, inlays, and endocrowns prepared with hybrid ceramics and pulp chambers restored with fiber-reinforced composite and resin composite that were radiopaque, light-cured, and flowable. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study was carried out on 252 extracted mandibular molars. All the specimens were divided into six groups randomly. Each group consisted of 42 specimens. Group 1 consisted of intact teeth without any access cavity. It was the control group. Group 2 consisted of teeth with endocrown and empty pulp chamber. Group 3 consisted of teeth with mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) onlay prepared with hybrid ceramics and pulp chamber filled with flowable, light-cured, radiopaque resin composite. Group 4 consisted of teeth with MOD onlay and pulp chamber filled with fiber-reinforced composite. Group 5 consisted of teeth with MOD inlay and pulp chamber filled with flowable, light-cured, radiopaque resin composite. Group 6 consisted of teeth with MOD inlay and pulp chamber filled with fiber-reinforced composite. Inlay, onlay, and endocrowns were prepared with computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided machine (CAM) using hybrid ceramics. Universal testing machine was used for the measurement of the fracture resistance of each specimen. Inferential statistics were performed by applying Fisher's exact test and chi-square test. RESULTS Fracture strength was found to be maximum in the intact teeth group followed by the endocrown. The fracture strength was minimum in the inlay group. The fracture strength was intermediate in the onlay groups. CONCLUSION Endocrown showed maximum fracture resistance as compared to the inlay and onlay restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Proper management of root canal-treated teeth is one of the greatest challenges for endodontists. It has been observed that tooth preparation design and the material used for the restoration of root canal-treated teeth play a vital role in the resistance against fracture in the teeth.

[1]  A. Bacchi,et al.  Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. , 2019, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[2]  Rosaiah Kanaparthy,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored Using Different Fiber Posts: An In Vitro Study. , 2019, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[3]  R. Zanetti,et al.  Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate of Endodontically Treated Mandibular Damaged Molars Based on Different Preparation Designs , 2019, International journal of biomaterials.

[4]  Ashraf S. Refai,et al.  Effect of Truss Access and Artificial Truss Restoration on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molars. , 2019, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  E. Başaran,et al.  Evaluation of the influence of various restoration techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth with different cavity wall thicknesses , 2019, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[6]  Sang J. Lee,et al.  Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM‐Fabricated Lithium Disilicate MOD Inlays and Onlays with Various Cavity Preparation Designs , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[7]  L. Baratieri,et al.  Influence of Preparation Reconstruction on the Compressive Strength of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays , 2019, International journal of biomaterials.

[8]  András Forster,et al.  In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Adhesively Restored Molar Teeth with Different MOD Cavity Dimensions , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[9]  A. Versluis,et al.  How biomechanics can affect the endodontic treated teeth and their restorative procedures? , 2018, Brazilian oral research.

[10]  C. Soares,et al.  Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars , 2018, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[11]  Sufyan Garoushi,et al.  Short fiber‐reinforced composite restorations: A review of the current literature , 2018, Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry.

[12]  M. Kazem,et al.  Impact of Access Cavity Design and Root Canal Taper on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth: An Ex Vivo Investigation , 2018, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  M. Wahsh,et al.  Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging , 2018, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[14]  G. Yıldırım,et al.  Fracture resistance and failure modes of lithium disilicate or composite endocrowns , 2018, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[15]  Sangwon Park,et al.  Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis , 2018, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[16]  R. Durkan,et al.  Effect of cavity design on the fracture resistance of zirconia onlay ceramics , 2018, Nigerian journal of clinical practice.

[17]  S. E. Özkir Effect of restoration material on stress distribution on partial crowns: A 3D finite element analysis , 2018, Journal of dental sciences.

[18]  B. Grosgogeat,et al.  Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD‐CAM block materials , 2017, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  R. Bedini,et al.  Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Different Access Cavity Designs , 2017, Journal of endodontics.

[20]  Mandava Ramesh Babu,et al.  The Effect of Cavity Design on Fracture Resistance and Failure Pattern in Monolithic Zirconia Partial Coverage Restorations - An In vitro Study. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[21]  P. Salimee,et al.  Effect of different composite core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with FRC posts , 2017, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[22]  E. Nagas,et al.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite. , 2016, Operative dentistry.

[23]  E. Münchow,et al.  Endocrown restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Journal of dentistry.

[24]  D. Heidemann,et al.  Fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored using ceramic onlays with or without fiber posts-an ex vivo study. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[25]  M. Özcan,et al.  Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays , 2016, Journal of dental research.

[26]  A. Mainjot,et al.  From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks , 2016, Journal of dental research.

[27]  H. Arslan,et al.  Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth , 2016, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[28]  S. Shibata,et al.  Effect of Silanization on Microtensile Bond Strength of Different Resin Cements to a Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic. , 2016, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[29]  I. Alshiddi,et al.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations – An in vitro study , 2015, The Saudi dental journal.

[30]  S. Mittal,et al.  Tensile Bond Strength of Self Adhesive Resin Cement After Various Surface Treatment of Enamel. , 2016, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[31]  Y. Oweis,et al.  Fracture of fiber-reinforced composites analyzed via acoustic emission. , 2015, Dental materials journal.

[32]  T. Attin,et al.  Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[33]  L. Fontanive,et al.  Polymerization efficiency and flexural strength of low-stress restorative composites. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[34]  Rajeev Kumar,et al.  Sample size calculation , 2012, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[35]  E. Berutti,et al.  Is fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with indirect onlay composite restorations influenced by fibre post insertion? , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[36]  Wei-rong Tang,et al.  Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[37]  S. Bhalerao,et al.  Sample size calculation , 2010, International journal of Ayurveda research.