Normal Behaviour Models for Wind Turbine Vibrations: Comparison of Neural Networks and a Stochastic Approach

To monitor wind turbine vibrations, normal behaviour models are built to predict tower top accelerations and drive-train vibrations. Signal deviations from model prediction are labelled as anomalies and are further investigated. In this paper we assess a stochastic approach to reconstruct the 1 Hz tower top acceleration signal, which was measured in a wind turbine located at the wind farm Alpha Ventus in the German North Sea. We compare the resulting data reconstruction with that of a model based on a neural network, which has been previously reported as a data-mining algorithm suitable for reconstructing this signal. Our results present evidence that the stochastic approach outperforms the neural network in the high frequency domain (1 Hz). Although neural network retrieves accurate step-forward predictions, with low mean square errors, the stochastic approach predictions better preserve the statistics and the frequency components of the original signal, retaining high accuracy levels. The implementation of our stochastic approach is available as open source code and can easily be adapted for other situations involving stochastic data reconstruction. Based on our findings we argue that such an approach could be implemented in signal reconstruction for monitoring purposes or for abnormal behaviour detection.

[1]  Zijun Zhang,et al.  Fault Analysis and Condition Monitoring of the Wind Turbine Gearbox , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[2]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Monitoring Wind Turbine Vibration Based on SCADA Data , 2012 .

[3]  Klaus Lehnertz,et al.  Disentangling the stochastic behavior of complex time series , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  To Explain or To Predict? , 2010, 1101.0891.

[5]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  A Data-Driven Diagnostic Framework for Wind Turbine Structures: A Holistic Approach , 2017, Sensors.

[6]  Joachim Peinke,et al.  Langevin power curve analysis for numerical wind energy converter models with new insights on high frequency power performance , 2015, 1511.01765.

[7]  Meik Schlechtingen,et al.  Comparative analysis of neural network and regression based condition monitoring approaches for wind turbine fault detection , 2011 .

[8]  David Infield,et al.  Online wind turbine fault detection through automated SCADA data analysis , 2009 .

[9]  Matthias Wachter,et al.  Fatigue Load Estimation through a Simple Stochastic Model , 2014, 1410.8005.

[10]  Chen Wang,et al.  Research and application of a combined model based on multi-objective optimization for multi-step ahead wind speed forecasting , 2017 .

[11]  Pedro G. Lind,et al.  Air quality prediction using optimal neural networks with stochastic variables , 2013, 1307.3134.

[12]  Fouad Slaoui-Hasnaoui,et al.  Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring: State-of-the-Art Review, New Trends, and Future Challenges , 2014 .

[13]  Miguel Ángel Sanz Bobi,et al.  SIMAP: Intelligent System for Predictive Maintenance: Application to the health condition monitoring of a windturbine gearbox , 2006 .

[14]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Analysis of wind turbine vibrations based on SCADA data , 2010 .

[15]  R. Friedrich,et al.  Analysis of data sets of stochastic systems , 1998 .

[16]  Shin Yee Khoo,et al.  Performance enhancement of wind turbine systems with vibration control: A review , 2015 .

[17]  Kesheng Wang,et al.  SCADA data based condition monitoring of wind turbines , 2014 .

[18]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Analyzing bearing faults in wind turbines: A data-mining approach , 2012 .

[19]  Po Wen Cheng,et al.  Validation of Uncertainty in IEC Damage Calculations Based on Measurements from Alpha Ventus , 2016 .

[20]  Pramod Bangalore,et al.  An artificial neural network‐based condition monitoring method for wind turbines, with application to the monitoring of the gearbox , 2017 .

[21]  J. Peinke,et al.  Description of a Turbulent Cascade by a Fokker-Planck Equation , 1997 .

[22]  J. Peinke,et al.  Stochastic method for in-situ damage analysis , 2012, 1202.0124.

[23]  Joachim Peinke,et al.  Approaching complexity by stochastic methods: From biological systems to turbulence , 2011 .

[24]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Review of Input Variable Selection Methods for Artificial Neural Networks , 2011 .

[25]  Yingning Qiu,et al.  Wind turbine condition monitoring: technical and commercial challenges , 2014 .

[26]  B. Lehle,et al.  Analysis of stochastic time series in the presence of strong measurement noise. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Prediction, operations, and condition monitoring in wind energy , 2013 .

[28]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[29]  Marcel Jirina,et al.  Selecting Representative Data Sets , 2012 .

[30]  Matthias Wachter,et al.  The Langevin Approach: An R Package for Modeling Markov Processes , 2016, 1603.02036.

[31]  Andrés Bustillo,et al.  Identifying maximum imbalance in datasets for fault diagnosis of gearboxes , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[32]  Adem Karahoca,et al.  Advances in Data Mining Knowledge Discovery and Applications , 2012 .